Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30689847›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2019

Comparative analyses identify genomic features potentially involved in the evolution of birds-of-paradise.

Stefan Prost, Ellie E Armstrong, Johan Nylander, Gregg W C Thomas, Alexander Suh, Bent Petersen, Love Dalen, Brett W Benz, Mozes P K Blom, Eleftheria Palkopoulou and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The genome of a globally invasive passerine, the common myna, Acridotheres tristis.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Stefan ProstDepartment of Biodiversity and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Frescativaegen 40, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden.
Ellie E ArmstrongDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305-5020, USA.
Johan NylanderDepartment of Biodiversity and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Frescativaegen 40, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden.
Gregg W C ThomasDepartment of Biology and School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, 1001 E. Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Alexander SuhDepartment of Evolutionary Biology (EBC), Uppsala University, Norbyvaegen 14-18, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden.
Bent PetersenNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Oster Voldgade 5-7, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Love DalenDepartment of Biodiversity and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Frescativaegen 40, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden.
Brett W BenzDepartment of Ornithology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West, New York, NY 10024, USA.
Mozes P K BlomDepartment of Biodiversity and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Frescativaegen 40, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden.
Eleftheria PalkopoulouDepartment of Biodiversity and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Frescativaegen 40, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden.
Per G P EricsonDepartment of Biodiversity and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Frescativaegen 40, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin IrestedtDepartment of Biodiversity and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Frescativaegen 40, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden.
Swedish Museum of Natural History · SEAmerican Museum of Natural History · USIndiana University Bloomington · USStanford University · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diverse array of phenotypes and courtship displays exhibited by birds-of-paradise have long fascinated scientists and nonscientists alike. Remarkably, almost nothing is known about the genomics of this iconic radiation. There are 41 species in 16 genera currently recognized within the birds-of-paradise family (Paradisaeidae), most of which are endemic to the island of New Guinea. In this study, we sequenced genomes of representatives from all five major clades within this family to characterize genomic changes that may have played a role in the evolution of the group's extensive phenotypic diversity. We found genes important for coloration, morphology, and feather and eye development to be under positive selection. In birds-of-paradise with complex lekking systems and strong sexual dimorphism, the core birds-of-paradise, we found Gene Ontology categories for "startle response" and "olfactory receptor activity" to be enriched among the gene families expanding significantly faster compared to the other birds in our study. Furthermore, we found novel families of retrovirus-like retrotransposons active in all three de novo genomes since the early diversification of the birds-of-paradise group, which might have played a role in the evolution of this fascinating group of birds.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomicsAnimalsGenomeMolecular Sequence AnnotationNew GuineaPasseriformesPhenotypePhylogenySex CharacteristicsWhole Genome Sequencingbirds-of-paradisecomparative genomicsgene gain-lossgenome structurepositive selection

Identifiers

PMID30689847
PMCPMC6497032
OpenAlexW2915065907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.