Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30689846›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2019

Overview of the BioCreative VI Precision Medicine Track: mining protein interactions and mutations for precision medicine.

Rezarta Islamaj Dogan, Sun Kim, Andrew Chatr-Aryamontri, Chih-Hsuan Wei, Donald C Comeau, Rui Antunes, Sérgio Matos, Qingyu Chen, Aparna Elangovan, Nagesh C Panyam and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Do LLMs Surpass Encoders for Biomedical NER?Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The overview of the BioRED (Biomedical Relation Extraction Dataset) track at BioCreative VIII.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. PHILM2Web: A high-throughput database of macromolecular host-pathogen interactions on the Web.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Rezarta Islamaj DoganNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sun KimNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Andrew Chatr-AryamontriInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Chih-Hsuan WeiNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Donald C ComeauNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Rui AntunesDepartment of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics (DETI)/Institute of Electronics and Informatics Engineering of Aveiro (IEETA), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Sérgio MatosDepartment of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics (DETI)/Institute of Electronics and Informatics Engineering of Aveiro (IEETA), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Qingyu ChenSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Aparna ElangovanSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nagesh C PanyamSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Karin VerspoorSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Hongfang LiuDepartment of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yanshan WangDepartment of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Zhuang LiuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.
Berna AltinelDepartment of Computer Engineering, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zehra Melce HüsünbeyiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Bogaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Arzucan Özgür
Aris FergadisSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou, Athens, Greece.
Chen-Kai WangGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hong-Jie DaiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Kaousiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Tung TranDepartment of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Ramakanth KavuluruDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Ling LuoCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.
Albert SteppiDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Florida, USA.
Jinfeng ZhangDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Florida, USA.
Jinchan QuDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Florida, USA.
Zhiyong LuNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Bernard Mark Evers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
BioGRID: An open resource for biological interactions and network analysisR01OD010929 · OD · SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM · PI KARA DOLINSKI, Mike Tyers · 2012 to 2026
$13.9M
Named Entity Recognition and Relationship Extraction in BiomedicineZIALM091813 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI LU, ZHIYONG · 2013 to 2022
$13.4M
Systematic data curation and integration to link models of human diseaseR24OD011194 · OD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI DOLINSKI, KARA · 2012 to 2014
$1.9M
Collaborative Research: Mathematical Framework for Biomolecules: From Protein to RNA to ChromosomesR01GM126558 · NIGMS · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, JINFENG · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126558NIH HHS R01 OD010929NIH HHS R24 OD011194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Precision Medicine Initiative is a multicenter effort aiming at formulating personalized treatments leveraging on individual patient data (clinical, genome sequence and functional genomic data) together with the information in large knowledge bases (KBs) that integrate genome annotation, disease association studies, electronic health records and other data types. The biomedical literature provides a rich foundation for populating these KBs, reporting genetic and molecular interactions that provide the scaffold for the cellular regulatory systems and detailing the influence of genetic variants in these interactions. The goal of BioCreative VI Precision Medicine Track was to extract this particular type of information and was organized in two tasks: (i) document triage task, focused on identifying scientific literature containing experimentally verified protein-protein interactions (PPIs) affected by genetic mutations and (ii) relation extraction task, focused on extracting the affected interactions (protein pairs). To assist system developers and task participants, a large-scale corpus of PubMed documents was manually annotated for this task. Ten teams worldwide contributed 22 distinct text-mining models for the document triage task, and six teams worldwide contributed 14 different text-mining systems for the relation extraction task. When comparing the text-mining system predictions with human annotations, for the triage task, the best F-score was 69.06%, the best precision was 62.89%, the best recall was 98.0% and the best average precision was 72.5%. For the relation extraction task, when taking homologous genes into account, the best F-score was 37.73%, the best precision was 46.5% and the best recall was 54.1%. Submitted systems explored a wide range of methods, from traditional rule-based, statistical and machine learning systems to state-of-the-art deep learning methods. Given the level of participation and the individual team results we find the precision medicine track to be successful in engaging the text-mining research community. In the meantime, the track produced a manually annotated corpus of 5509 PubMed documents developed by BioGRID curators and relevant for precision medicine. The data set is freely available to the community, and the specific interactions have been integrated into the BioGRID data set. In addition, this challenge provided the first results of automatically identifying PubMed articles that describe PPI affected by mutations, as well as extracting the affected relations from those articles. Still, much progress is needed for computer-assisted precision medicine text mining to become mainstream. Future work should focus on addressing the remaining technical challenges and incorporating the practical benefits of text-mining tools into real-world precision medicine information-related curation.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinMutationProtein Interaction MapsSoftwareComputational BiologyData MiningHumansPrecision MedicineProtein Interaction Mapping

Identifiers

PMID30689846
PMCPMC6348314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.