Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30689841›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2019

Exome Resequencing Reveals Evolutionary History, Genomic Diversity, and Targets of Selection in the Conifers Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii.

Juan J Acosta, Annette M Fahrenkrog, Leandro G Neves, Márcio F R Resende, Christopher Dervinis, John M Davis, Jason A Holliday, Matias Kirst

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Toward genomic selection inApplications in plant sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Genomics of Clinal Local Adaptation inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. 275 years of forestry meets genomics inEvolutionary applications · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juan J AcostaSchool of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida.
Annette M FahrenkrogSchool of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida.
Leandro G NevesSchool of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida.
Márcio F R ResendeHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida.
Christopher DervinisSchool of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida.
John M DavisSchool of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida.
Jason A HollidayDepartment of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Matias KirstSchool of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida.
University of Florida · USU.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii) are ecologically and economically important pine species that dominate many forest ecosystems in the southern United States, but like all conifers, the study of their genetic diversity and demographic history has been hampered by their large genome size. A small number of studies mainly based on candidate-gene sequencing have been reported for P. taeda to date, whereas none are available for P. elliottii. Targeted exome resequencing has recently enabled population genomics studies for conifers, approach used here to assess genomic diversity, signatures of selection, population structure, and demographic history of P. elliottii and P. taeda. Extensive similarities were revealed between these species: both species feature rapid linkage disequilibrium decay and high levels of genetic diversity. Moreover, genome-wide positive correlations for measures of genetic diversity between the species were also observed, likely due to shared structural genomic constraints. Also, positive selection appears to be targeting a common set of genes in both pines. Demographic history differs between both species, with only P. taeda being affected by a dramatic bottleneck during the last glacial period. The ability of P. taeda to recover from a dramatic reduction in population size while still retaining high levels of genetic diversity shows promise for other pines facing environmental stressors associated with climate change, indicating that these too may be able to adapt successfully to new future conditions even after a drastic population size contraction.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetic VariationSelection, GeneticComputer SimulationLinkage DisequilibriumOvulePinus taedaPopulation Dynamicsdemographyexomegenetic diversitynatural selectionPinus elliottiiPinus taeda

Identifiers

PMID30689841
PMCPMC6385631
OpenAlexW2912942907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.