Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30689759›Full record

Observational studyClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

Treatment Effectiveness of Azithromycin and Doxycycline in Uncomplicated Rectal and Vaginal Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Women: A Multicenter Observational Study (FemCure).

Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers, Petra F G Wolffs, Henry De Vries, Hannelore M Götz, Titia Heijman, Sylvia Bruisten, Lisanne Eppings, Arjan Hogewoning, Mieke Steenbakkers, Mayk Lucchesi and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02694497 (Understanding Transmission of Genital and Extra-genital Chlamydia Trachomatis Infections in Women Receiving Routine Care; Implications for Control Strategies), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02694497 completednot on this map

Understanding Transmission of Genital and Extra-genital Chlamydia Trachomatis Infections in Women Receiving Routine Care; Implications for Control Strategies

TypeobservationalSponsorMaastricht University Medical CenterRan2016 to 2017Enrolled560ConditionsChlamydia Trachomatis InfectionArmsChlamydia care as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2021
    Guideline
  3. Doxycycline Versus Azithromycin for the Treatment of Rectal Chlamydia in Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. High Prevalence of RectalOpen forum infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Impact of First-Line Antimicrobials onFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole H T M Dukers-MuijrersDepartment of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, and Environmental Health, Heerlen, South Limburg Public Health Service, The Netherlands.
Petra F G WolffsDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Henry De VriesDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hannelore M GötzNational Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Epidemiology and Surveillance Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Titia HeijmanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sylvia BruistenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lisanne EppingsDepartment of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, and Environmental Health, Heerlen, South Limburg Public Health Service, The Netherlands.
Arjan HogewoningDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mieke SteenbakkersDepartment of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, and Environmental Health, Heerlen, South Limburg Public Health Service, The Netherlands.
Mayk LucchesiDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Maarten F Schim van der LoeffDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christian J P A HoebeDepartment of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, and Environmental Health, Heerlen, South Limburg Public Health Service, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLGGD Amsterdam · NLGGD Zuid Limburg · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRectal infections with Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) are prevalent in women visiting a sexually transmitted infection outpatient clinic, but it remains unclear what the most effective treatment is. We assessed the effectiveness of doxycycline and azithromycin for the treatment of rectal and vaginal chlamydia in women.

methodsThis study is part of a prospective multicenter cohort study (FemCure). Treatment consisted of doxycycline (100 mg twice daily for 7 days) in rectal CT-positive women, and of azithromycin (1 g single dose) in vaginally positive women who were rectally untested or rectally negative. Participants self-collected rectal and vaginal samples at enrollment (treatment time-point) and during 4 weeks of follow-up. The endpoint was microbiological cure by a negative nucleic acid amplification test at 4 weeks. Differences between cure proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

resultsWe analyzed 416 patients, of whom 319 had both rectal and vaginal chlamydia at enrollment, 22 had rectal chlamydia only, and 75 had vaginal chlamydia only. In 341 rectal infections, microbiological cure in azithromycin-treated women was 78.5% (95% CI, 72.6%-83.7%; n = 164/209) and 95.5% (95% CI, 91.0%-98.2%; n = 126/132) in doxycycline-treated women (difference, 17.0% [95% CI, 9.6%-24.7%]; P < .001). In 394 vaginal infections, cure was 93.5% (95% CI, 90.1%-96.1%; n = 246/263) in azithromycin-treated women and 95.4% (95% CI, 90.9%-98.2%; n = 125/131) in doxycycline-treated women (difference, 1.9% [95% CI, -3.6% to 6.7%]; P = .504).

conclusionsThe effectiveness of doxycycline is high and exceeds that of azithromycin for the treatment of rectal CT infections in women. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02694497.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisDoxycyclineRectumVaginaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinDoxycyclineChlamydia trachomatisrectaltreatment effectivenesswomen

Identifiers

PMID30689759
PMCPMC6853690
OpenAlexW2911568187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.