Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2019
OlympiAD final overall survival and tolerability results: Olaparib versus chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 442 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomised, Controlled, Multi-centre Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib Monotherapy Versus Physicians Choice Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients With Germline BRCA1/2 Mutations.
Phase I Dose Finding Study of Selinexor and Talazoparib in Patients With Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors, Followed by Phase II Expansion Cohort Study in Patients With Advanced/ Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancers. (START)
Who cites it
442 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 736 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and tolerability of PARP inhibitors in cancer patients: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of subsequent-line therapies for advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a bayesian network meta-analysis.Oncology reviews · 2026Pooled it
- [Systemic treatment of breast cancer: professional guideline].Magyar onkologia · 2025Guideline
- The impact of PET imaging on triple negative breast cancer: an updated evidence-based perspective.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Pooled it
- 6th and 7th International consensus guidelines for the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC guidelines 6 and 7).Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2024Guideline
- Hormone, Targeted, and Combinational Therapies for Breast Cancers: From Humans to Dogs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Multimodal assessment of exceptional responders refines subtyping-directed precision treatment in HR+/HER2- breast cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Trial
- Randomized phase 2 trial of a PARP inhibitor TSL-1502 in germline BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Trial
- Saruparib in combination with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: EvoPAR-Prostate01.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Maintenance olaparib after platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic endometrial cancer: GINECO randomized phase IIb UTOLA trial.Nature communications · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Phase II DORA Study of Olaparib with or without Durvalumab as a Chemotherapy-Free Maintenance Strategy in Platinum-Pretreated Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Trial
- Clinical effectiveness and safety of olaparib in BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting: final analysis of LUCY.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Trial
- Beyond conventional therapies: the evolution of targeted agents and immunotherapies in triple-negative breast cancer.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Review
- Expanding the therapeutic scope of PARP inhibitors in breast cancer: current indications and future directions.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Use of Metronomic Chemotherapy in Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Safety and efficacy of ceralasertib, an ATR kinase inhibitor, combined with olaparib: dose escalation in advanced solid tumours and dose expansion in advanced breast cancer.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Synthetic lethality in cancer: mechanisms, therapeutic exploitation and clinical translation.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- TALAVE in Breast Cancer:bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
382 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the OlympiAD study, olaparib was shown to improve progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with a germline BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We now report the planned final overall survival (OS) results, and describe the most common adverse events (AEs) to better understand olaparib tolerability in this population. PATIENTS AND
methodsOlympiAD, a Phase III, randomized, controlled, open-label study (NCT02000622), enrolled patients with a germline BRCAm and HER2-negative mBC who had received ≤2 lines of chemotherapy for mBC. Patients were randomized to olaparib tablets (300 mg bid) or predeclared TPC (capecitabine, vinorelbine, or eribulin). OS and safety were secondary end points.
resultsA total of 205 patients were randomized to olaparib and 97 to TPC. At 64% data maturity, median OS was 19.3 months with olaparib versus 17.1 months with TPC (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.66-1.23; P = 0.513); median follow-up was 25.3 and 26.3 months, respectively. HR for OS with olaparib versus TPC in prespecified subgroups were: prior chemotherapy for mBC [no (first-line setting): 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.90; yes (second/third-line): 1.13, 0.79-1.64]; receptor status (triple negative: 0.93, 0.62-1.43; hormone receptor positive: 0.86, 0.55-1.36); prior platinum (yes: 0.83, 0.49-1.45; no: 0.91, 0.64-1.33). Adverse events during olaparib treatment were generally low grade and manageable by supportive treatment or dose modification. There was a low rate of treatment discontinuation (4.9%), and the risk of developing anemia did not increase with extended olaparib exposure.
conclusionsWhile there was no statistically significant improvement in OS with olaparib compared to TPC, there was the possibility of meaningful OS benefit among patients who had not received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Olaparib was generally well-tolerated, with no evidence of cumulative toxicity during extended exposure. Please see the article online for additional video content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.