Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30689653›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Model uncertainty and simulated multispecies fisheries management advice in the Baltic Sea.

Barbara Bauer, Jan Horbowy, Mika Rahikainen, Nataliia Kulatska, Bärbel Müller-Karulis, Maciej T Tomczak, Valerio Bartolino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Barbara BauerBaltic Sea Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2688-2788
Jan HorbowyDepartment of Fisheries Resources, National Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Gdynia, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5743-6460
Mika RahikainenEcosystems and Environment Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Nataliia KulatskaDepartment of Aquatic Resources, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lysekil, Sweden.
Bärbel Müller-KarulisBaltic Sea Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maciej T TomczakBaltic Sea Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5956-0115
Valerio BartolinoDepartment of Aquatic Resources, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lysekil, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different ecosystem models often provide contrasting predictions (model uncertainty), which is perceived to be a major challenge impeding their use to support ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM). The focus of this manuscript is to examine the extent of model disagreements which could impact management advice for EBFM in the central Baltic Sea. We compare how much three models (EwE, Gadget and a multispecies stock production model) differ in 1) their estimates of fishing mortality rates (Fs) satisfying alternative hypothetical management scenario objectives and 2) the outcomes of those scenarios in terms of performance indicators (spawning stock biomasses, catches, profits). Uncertainty in future environmental conditions affecting fish was taken into account by considering two seal population growth scenarios and two nutrient load scenarios. Differences in the development of the stocks, yields and profits exist among the models but the general patterns are also sufficiently similar to appear promising in the context of strategic fishery advice. Thus, we suggest that disagreements among the ecosystem models will not impede their use for providing strategic advice on how to reach management objectives that go beyond the traditional maximum yield targets and for informing on the potential consequences of pursuing such objectives. This is especially true for scenarios aiming at exploiting forage fish sprat and herring, for which the agreement was the largest among our models. However, the quantitative response to altering fishing pressure differed among models. This was due to the diverse environmental covariates and the different number of trophic relationships and their functional forms considered in the models. This suggests that ecosystem models can be used to provide quantitative advice only after more targeted research is conducted to gain a deeper understanding into the relationship between trophic links and fish population dynamics in the Baltic Sea.

Indexed as

FisheriesAnimalsBaltic StatesBiomassFishesModels, EconomicOceans and Seas

Identifiers

PMID30689653
PMCPMC6349338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.