Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30689632›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Effects of HIIT and MICT on cardiovascular risk factors in adults with overweight and/or obesity: A meta-analysis.

LiQiang Su, JinMei Fu, ShunLi Sun, GuangGao Zhao, Wei Cheng, ChuanChuan Dou, MingHui Quan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04456192 (Effects of an Indoor Cycling Program on Cardio-Metabolic Factors in Women With Obesity and Normal Body Weight), which is not on this map. Cited by 99 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04456192 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of an Indoor Cycling Program on Cardio-Metabolic Factors in Women With Obesity and Normal Body Weight

TypeinterventionalSponsorPoznan University of Physical EducationRan2013 to 2016Enrolled31ConditionsObesity, Dyslipidemias, Hypertension, Type 2 DiabetesArmsIndoor Cycling Interval Exercise Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Rates of compliance and adherence to high-intensity interval training: a systematic review and Meta-analyses.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. HIIT vs. SIT: What Is the Better to Improve V˙OInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Effect of different types of regular exercise on physical fitness in adults with overweight or obesity: Systematic review and meta-analyses.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2021
    Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

LiQiang SuSchool of Physical Education and Sport Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3460-780X
JinMei FuJiangxi Research Institute of Sports Science, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
ShunLi SunJiangxi Research Institute of Sports Science, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
GuangGao ZhaoDepartment of Physical Education, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Wei ChengDepartment of Endocrinology, Yangpu Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
ChuanChuan DouCollege of Humanities, Jiang Xi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
MingHui QuanSchool of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in adults with overweight and obesity.

methodsTwenty-two articles were included by searching six databases, the total number of subjects was 620 in these articles. Outcomes were synthesised using a random-effects meta-analysis of the Standardized mean difference (SMD) in CVD risk factors.

resultsHIIT and MICT resulted in statistically significant reductions in Weight, BMI, fat%, total cholesterol(TC), and improvement in VO2max. Compared with MICT, subgroup of durations of HIIT training interval ≥2 min can significantly increase VO2max (SMD = 0.444, 95% CI:0.037~0.851,P = 0.032), subgroup of energy expenditure of HIIT equal to MICT can significantly increase VO2max (SMD = 0.399, 95% CI:0.106~0.692,P = 0.008).

conclusionsHIIT appears to provide similar benefits to MICT for improving body composition, VO2maxand TC, but HIIT spent less time than MICT by 9.7 min on one session. HIIT is superior to MICT in improving cardiopulmonary fitness when durations of HIIT training interval ≥2 min or energy expenditure of HIIT same as MICT. PROSPERO ID: CRD42016045835.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansMaleObesityOverweightPhysical Conditioning, HumanRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID30689632
PMCPMC6349321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.