ArticleJournal of Huntington's disease2019
Attitudes of Potential Participants Towards Molecular Therapy Trials in Huntington's Disease.
Article in Journal of Huntington's disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preferences for genetic interventions for SCA and Huntington's disease: results of a discrete choice experiment among patients.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Anything is better than nothing': exploring attitudes towards novel therapies in leukodystrophy clinical trials.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Genetic Interventions for Spinocerebellar Ataxia and Huntington's Disease: A Qualitative Study of the Patient Perspective.Journal of Huntington's disease · 2024Article
- Searching for Answers: Information-Seeking by Young People At-Risk for Huntington's Disease.Journal of Huntington's disease · 2022Article
- Perceptions about Research Participation among Individuals at Risk and Individuals with Premanifest Huntington's Disease: A Survey Conducted by the European Huntington Association.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Positive Attitudes and Therapeutic Misconception Around Hypothetical Clinical Trial Participation in the Huntington's Disease Community.Journal of Huntington's disease · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in molecular therapeutic approaches in the last decade are translating into the design of non-traditional clinical trials. In order to improve their feasibility, it is important to understand the attitudes of potential participants towards these trials, their motivations to get involved and acceptance of risks.
objectiveWe aimed to better understand the willingness of potential participants to participate in different molecular therapy trials for Huntington's disease (HD) based on their clinical and genetic status, trial design and goals of the treatment.
methodsAn anonymous survey was distributed through the Huntington's Disease Society of America (HDSA) on-line portal/website. Various hypothetical scenarios were presented followed by a survey consistent of Likert scale responses ascertaining willingness to participate, collecting demographic, clinical and genetic information.
resultsThere were a total of 87 responses, including patients diagnosed with HD, pre-manifesting mutation carriers and asymptomatic participants at risk. The majority of participants indicated they were very likely or likely to participate in clinical trials independent of study design or goals of the therapy, with a more favorable view in premanifesting mutation carriers. However, more invasive procedures and trials including placebo were less favorably viewed across all diagnostic groups.
conclusionsIn summary, most individuals in the HD community would consider participation in novel molecular therapy trials, but study design and goals could impact patient recruitment. This data can be used to inform the recruitment and consent process into clinical trials and to address common concerns by potential participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.