Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30689494›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019

A randomized, controlled, pragmatic trial of an iPad-based, tailored messaging intervention to increase human papillomavirus vaccination among Latinos.

Amanda F Dempsey, Julie Maertens, Carter Sevick, Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda F Dempseya Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Dissemination Science, University of Colorado , Aurora, CO , USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7085-6259
Julie Maertensa Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Dissemination Science, University of Colorado , Aurora, CO , USA.
Carter Sevicka Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Dissemination Science, University of Colorado , Aurora, CO , USA.
Andrea Jimenez-Zambranoa Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Dissemination Science, University of Colorado , Aurora, CO , USA.
Elizabeth Juarez-Colungaa Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Dissemination Science, University of Colorado , Aurora, CO , USA.
Outcomes Research Consortium · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes a number of cancers that disproportionally affect Latinos yet there is a paucity of research on interventions to increase HPV vaccination among this population. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of a web-based, individually customizable intervention, called CHICOs (

Indexed as

InternetVaccination CoverageAdolescentAdultBehavior TherapyChildDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHealth EducationHispanic or LatinoHumansMalePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultPapillomavirus Vaccinesclinical trialhealth communicationHuman papillomavirusLatinovaccination

Identifiers

PMID30689494
PMCPMC6746523
OpenAlexW2912007077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.