Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30689493›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2019

The use of the Brief Child Abuse Potential Inventory in the general population in Finland.

Noora Ellonen, Heidi Rantanen, Sari Lepistö, Mika Helminen, Eija Paavilainen

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Utilizing the Brief Child Abuse Potential Inventory in a cohort of children with early childhood caries.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The use of BCAP in Finland: toward correct classification rate.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Noora Ellonena Institute of Criminology and Legal Policy , Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland.
Heidi Rantanenb Faculty of Social Sciences , Tampere University , Tampere , Finland.
Sari Lepistöb Faculty of Social Sciences , Tampere University , Tampere , Finland.
Mika Helminenb Faculty of Social Sciences , Tampere University , Tampere , Finland.
Eija Paavilainenb Faculty of Social Sciences , Tampere University , Tampere , Finland.
Tampere University · FITampere University · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this research was to analyze psychometric information in the Brief Child Abuse Potential Inventory (BCAP) in a Finnish general population sample.

designA self-report survey of parents in a primary health care setting and a hospital setting was used to evaluate the use of the BCAP.

settingThe study population consisted of parents who were visiting one of the following contexts: a primary maternity health care clinic, a child health care clinic, and the maternity outpatient clinic, various pediatric outpatient clinics, the general pediatric ward, the pediatric surgical ward, or the neonatal intensive care unit in a hospital setting. SUBJECTS: The BCAP was given to parents at the 30-34th week of pregnancy, when the child was 5 months old or all parents depending on the context. The BCAP was delivered to 759 parents. The final size of the sample was 453 respondents.

main outcome measureThe BCAP, which consisted of 25 items to screen child abuse potential and nine items for evaluation of respondent validity.

resultsThe internal consistency of the Abuse Risk Scale was good (.770), and the validity scales worked well. The factor structure mirrors with the original factors structure.

conclusionThe psychometric properties of the BCAP reported in the analysis suggest that the BCAP could be a valid instrument to detect child abuse potential in the general population in Finnish health care settings. However, among Finnish respondents there is very little variation in some parts of the measure, which suggests that further research should assess the validity of the instrument in representative samples. Further analysis is also needed to evaluate the correct classification rate of the BCAP. Key points Identification of families at risk of child maltreatment requires valid tools to recognize risk within the general population, as part of child and family needs and risk assessments in family services. 1. The BCAP is valid, reliable, and useful in bringing parental worries under discussion in child and family services. 2. Results of this study can be used for a more systematic and valid child maltreatment risk assessment for identifying families who need help managing their everyday lives.

Indexed as

Child AbuseParent-Child RelationsParentsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFinlandHumansInfantMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsChild abusechild maltreatmentchildrenfamily practiceFinlandparentspreventionrisk

Identifiers

PMID30689493
PMCPMC6452807
OpenAlexW2912630487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.