Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30689490›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2019

Quality of out-of-hours telephone triage by general practitioners and nurses: development and testing of the AQTT - an assessment tool measuring communication, patient safety and efficiency.

D S Graversen, A F Pedersen, A H Carlsen, F Bro, L Huibers, M B Christensen

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Evaluation of the performance of telephone triage service.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reliability of Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D S Graversena Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark & Department of Public Health, Aarhus University , Aarhus C , Denmark.
A F Pedersena Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark & Department of Public Health, Aarhus University , Aarhus C , Denmark.
A H Carlsena Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark & Department of Public Health, Aarhus University , Aarhus C , Denmark.
F Broa Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark & Department of Public Health, Aarhus University , Aarhus C , Denmark.
L Huibersa Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark & Department of Public Health, Aarhus University , Aarhus C , Denmark.
M B Christensena Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark & Department of Public Health, Aarhus University , Aarhus C , Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a valid and reliable assessment tool able to measure quality of communication, patient safety and efficiency in out-of-hours (OOH) telephone triage conducted by both general practitioners (GP) and nurses.

designThe Dutch KERNset tool was translated into Danish and supplemented with items from other existing tools. Face validity, content validity and applicability in OOH telephone triage (OOH-TT) were secured through a two-round Delphi process involving relevant stakeholders. Forty-eight OOH patient contacts were assessed by 24 assessors in test-retest and inter-rater designs.

settingOOH-TT services in Denmark conducted by GPs, nurses or doctors with varying medical specialisation. PATIENTS: Audio-recorded OOH patient contacts.

main outcome measuresTest-retest and inter-rater reliability were analysed using ICC

resultsMajor adaptations during the Delphi process were made. The 24-item assessment tool (Assessment of Quality in Telephone Triage - AQTT) measured communicative quality, health-related quality and four overall quality aspects. The test-retest ICC

conclusionThe AQTT demonstrated high face, content and construct validity, satisfactory test-retest reliability, reduced inter-rater reliability, but satisfactory percent agreement when differentiating between 'poor' and 'sufficient' quality. The AQTT was found feasible and clinically relevant for assessing the quality of GP- and nurse-led OOH-TT. KEYPOINTS Comparative knowledge is sparse regarding quality of out-of-hours telephone triage conducted by general practitioners and nurses. The assessment tool (AQTT) enables assessment of quality in OOH telephone triage conducted by nurses and general practitioners AQTT is feasible and clinically relevant for assessment of communication, patient safety and efficiency. AQTT can be used to identify areas for improvement in telephone triage.

Indexed as

General PractitionersNursesQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTelephoneAdultAfter-Hours CareAgedCommunicationDenmarkEfficiencyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareAfter hours carecommunicationgeneral practitionersoutcome assessment (health care)patient safetytelephonetriage

Identifiers

PMID30689490
PMCPMC6454404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.