Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30689268›Full record

SynthesisHuman brain mapping2019

Neural networks for sentence comprehension and production: An ALE-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Matthew Walenski, Eduardo Europa, David Caplan, Cynthia K Thompson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01927302 (The Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01927302 nacompletednot on this map

The Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery (CNLR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2013 to 2019Enrolled90ConditionsAphasia, Dysgraphia, Anomia, AgrammatismArmsTreatment Focusing on Naming Objects, Treatment Focusing on Improving Spelling Abilities, Treatment Focusing on Improving Sentence Processing, No Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The brain network in support of social semantic accumulation.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Acute-Phase Machine Learning Prediction of 12-Month Aphasia and Discourse Recovery.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew WalenskiCenter for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0002-8607-1218
Eduardo EuropaDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco.
David CaplanDepartment of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cynthia K ThompsonCenter for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0003-3197-3457
Northwestern University · USHarvard University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Neurobiology of Language Recovery in Aphasia: Natural History and Treatment-Ind*P50DC012283 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI THOMPSON, CYNTHIA K · 2013 to 2017
$11.7M
National Institutes of Health-NIDCD, Clinical Research Center P50DC012283NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC012283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehending and producing sentences is a complex endeavor requiring the coordinated activity of multiple brain regions. We examined three issues related to the brain networks underlying sentence comprehension and production in healthy individuals: First, which regions are recruited for sentence comprehension and sentence production? Second, are there differences for auditory sentence comprehension vs. visual sentence comprehension? Third, which regions are specifically recruited for the comprehension of syntactically complex sentences? Results from activation likelihood estimation (ALE) analyses (from 45 studies) implicated a sentence comprehension network occupying bilateral frontal and temporal lobe regions. Regions implicated in production (from 15 studies) overlapped with the set of regions associated with sentence comprehension in the left hemisphere, but did not include inferior frontal cortex, and did not extend to the right hemisphere. Modality differences between auditory and visual sentence comprehension were found principally in the temporal lobes. Results from the analysis of complex syntax (from 37 studies) showed engagement of left inferior frontal and posterior temporal regions, as well as the right insula. The involvement of the right hemisphere in the comprehension of these structures has potentially important implications for language treatment and recovery in individuals with agrammatic aphasia following left hemisphere brain damage.

Indexed as

NeuroimagingPsycholinguisticsReadingComprehensionFrontal LobeHumansNerve NetPattern Recognition, VisualSpeechSpeech PerceptionTemporal LobeALElanguagemeta-analysissentence comprehensionsentence processing networkssentence production

Identifiers

PMID30689268
PMCPMC6597252
OpenAlexW2914123471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.