Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30689207›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2019

Evaluation of medial division of the medial geniculate (MGM) and posterior intralaminar nucleus (PIN) inputs to the rat auditory cortex, amygdala, and striatum.

Philip H Smith, Daniel J Uhlrich, Karen A Manning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Development of Auditory Cortex Circuits.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philip H SmithDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0003-3841-7031
Daniel J UhlrichDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Karen A ManningDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.

Funding

Structure and function of the medial superior oliveR01DC012782 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SMITH, PHILIP H · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medial division of the medial geniculate (MGM) and the posterior intralaminar nucleus (PIN) are association nuclei of the auditory thalamus. We made tracer injections in these nuclei to evaluate/compare their presynaptic terminal and postsynaptic target features in auditory cortex, amygdala and striatum, at the light and electron microscopic levels. Cortical labeling was concentrated in Layer 1 but in other layers distribution was location-dependent. In cortical areas designated dorsal, primary and ventral (AuD, Au1, AuV) terminals deep to Layer 1 were concentrated in infragranular layers and sparser in the supragranular and middle layers. In ectorhinal cortex (Ect), distributions below Layer 1 changed with concentrations in supragranular and middle layers. In temporal association cortex (TeA) terminal distributions below Layer 1 was intermediate between AuV/1/D and Ect. In amygdala and striatum, terminal concentrations were higher in striatum but not as dense as in cortical Layer 1. Ultrastructurally, presynaptic terminal size was similar in amygdala, striatum or cortex and in all cortical layers. Postsynaptically MGM/PIN terminals everywhere synapsed on spines or small distal dendrites but as a population the postsynaptic structures in cortex were larger than those in the striatum. In addition, primary cortical targets of terminals were larger in primary cortex than in area Ect. Thus, although postsynaptic size may play some role in changes in synaptic influence between areas it appears that terminal size is not a variable used for that purpose. In auditory cortex, cortical subdivision-dependent changes in the terminal distribution between cortical layers may also play a role.

Indexed as

AmygdalaAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysAxonsBrain MappingCorpus StriatumGeniculate BodiesIntralaminar Thalamic NucleiMaleMicroscopy, ElectronRatsRats, Long-EvansSynapseselectron microscopyRRID:AB_2336606RRID:RGD_5508398RRID:SCR_001935RRID:SCR002815RRID_SCR_006369RRID:SCR_014199RRID:SCR_014483RRID:SCR_016299thalamoamygdalarthalamocorticalthalamostriatal

Identifiers

PMID30689207
PMCPMC6690052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.