ReviewJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2019
Biofabrication for osteochondral tissue regeneration: bioink printability requirements.
Review in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformation of the Biological Paradigm in Bone Regeneration: An Integrative Review.Journal of developmental biology · 2026Review
- DNA-encoded dynamic hydrogels for 3D bioprinted cartilage organoids.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Modern Approach to Testing the Biocompatibility of Osteochondral Scaffolds in Accordance with the 3Rs Principle─PreclinicalACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Integrating bioprinting, cell therapies and drug delivery towards in vivo regeneration of cartilage, bone and osteochondral tissue.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024Review
- Polysaccharide-based hydrogels for cartilage regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- 3D printed osteochondral scaffolds: design strategies, present applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Bioprinting-Enabled Biomaterials: A Cutting-Edge Strategy for Future Osteoarthritis Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Review
- Gelatin Methacryloyl Hydrogels for Musculoskeletal Tissue Regeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Recent Developments in Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogels for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications.Polymers · 2022Review
- 3D-Printed Hydrogels in Orthopedics: Developments, Limitations, and Perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Directed Regeneration of Osteochondral Tissue by Hierarchical Assembly of Spatially Organized Composite Spheroids.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- CNS Organoid Surpasses Cell-Laden Microgel Assembly to Promote Spinal Cord Injury Repair.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- Advanced injectable hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- 3D Printed Multiphasic Scaffolds for Osteochondral Repair: Challenges and Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Fabrication and maturation of integrated biphasic anatomic mesenchymal stromal cell-laden composite scaffolds for osteochondral repair and joint resurfacing.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021Article
- 3D Printing and Bioprinting to Model Bone Cancer: The Role of Materials and Nanoscale Cues in Directing Cell Behavior.Cancers · 2021Review
- Tissue Engineering Strategies to Increase Osteochondral Regeneration of Stem Cells; a Close Look at Different Modalities.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2021Review
- Recent Advancements in 3D Printing of Polysaccharide Hydrogels in Cartilage Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Challenges and Innovations in Osteochondral Regeneration: Insights from Biology and Inputs from Bioengineering toward the Optimization of Tissue Engineering Strategies.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2021Review
- Polysaccharide hydrogel based 3D printed tumor models for chemotherapeutic drug screening.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biofabrication allows the formation of 3D scaffolds through a precise spatial control. This is of foremost importance when aiming to mimic heterogeneous and anisotropic architecture, such as that of the osteochondral tissue. Osteochondral defects are a supreme challenge for tissue engineering due to the compositional and structural complexity of stratified architecture and contrasting biomechanical properties of the cartilage-bone interface. This review highlights the advancements and retreats witnessed by using developed bioinks for tissue regeneration, taking osteochondral tissue as a challenging example. Methods, materials and requirements for bioprinting were discussed, highlighting the pre and post-processing factors that researchers should consider towards the development of a clinical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30689057What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.