Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30689037›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2019

Interobserver agreement of skeletal muscle mass measurement on head and neck CT imaging at the level of the third cervical vertebra.

S I Bril, A W Wendrich, J E Swartz, I Wegner, F Pameijer, E J Smid, G H Bol, A J Pothen, R de Bree

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. How do patients with head and neck cancer and low skeletal muscle mass experience cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy? A qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Role of sarcopenia on survival and treatment-related toxicity in head and neck cancer: a narrative review of current evidence and future perspectives.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

S I BrilDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, House Postal Number Q.04.5.300, Heidelberglaan 100, PO BOX 85500, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A W WendrichDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J E SwartzDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
I WegnerDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, House Postal Number Q.04.5.300, Heidelberglaan 100, PO BOX 85500, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
F PameijerDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E J SmidDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
G H BolDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A J PothenDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, House Postal Number Q.04.5.300, Heidelberglaan 100, PO BOX 85500, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
R de BreeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, House Postal Number Q.04.5.300, Heidelberglaan 100, PO BOX 85500, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. r.debree@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7128-5814
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

Michel Keijzer Fonds 2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSkeletal muscle mass (SMM) is most often assessed in cancer patients on abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging at the level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). Abdominal CT imaging is not routinely performed in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Recently, a novel method to assess SMM on a single transversal CT slice at the level of the third cervical vertebra (C3) was published. The objective of this study was to assess the robustness of this novel C3 measurement method in terms of interobserver agreement. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients diagnosed with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) at our center between 2007 and 2011 were evaluated. Fifty-four patients with were randomly selected for analysis. Six observers independently measured the cross-sectional muscle area (CSMA) at the level of C3 using a predefined, written protocol as instruction. Interobserver agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), a Bland-Altman plot and Fleiss' kappa (κ).

resultsThe agreement in vertebra selection between all observers was excellent (Fleiss' κ: 0.96). There was a substantial agreement between all observers in single slice selection (Fleiss' κ: 0.61). For all CSMA measurements, ICCs were excellent (0.763-0.969; all p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between measurements, with narrow limits of agreement.

conclusionInterobserver agreement for SMM measurement at the level of C3 was excellent. Assessment of SMM at the level of C3 is easy and robust and can performed on routinely available imaging in HNC patients.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeMuscle, SkeletalCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSarcopeniaSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckTomography, X-Ray ComputedBody compositionComputed tomographyHead and neck neoplasmsObserver variationSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID30689037
PMCPMC6426814
OpenAlexW2912889783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.