Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30689007›Full record

ReviewHNO2019

[Perspectives of genome editing in otorhinolaryngology].

F Oppel, M Schürmann, S Shao, B Kaltschmidt, C Kaltschmidt, H Sudhoff

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F OppelKlinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Klinikum Bielefeld, Teutoburger Str. 50, 33604, Bielefeld, Deutschland.
M SchürmannKlinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Klinikum Bielefeld, Teutoburger Str. 50, 33604, Bielefeld, Deutschland.
S ShaoKlinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Klinikum Bielefeld, Teutoburger Str. 50, 33604, Bielefeld, Deutschland.
B KaltschmidtAG Molekulare Neurobiologie, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Deutschland.
C KaltschmidtInstitut für Zellbiologie, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Deutschland.
H SudhoffKlinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Klinikum Bielefeld, Teutoburger Str. 50, 33604, Bielefeld, Deutschland. holger.sudhoff@rub.de.
Klinikum Bielefeld · DEBielefeld University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in DNA sequencing technology have enabled researchers to identify the genetic background underlying human illness. In addition, the latest genome editing technology, CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated protein 9), provides great potential to edit genomic DNA sequences precisely with high efficiency. This technology has been evaluated for treatment of genetic diseases in recently published preclinical studies. Since many such genetic disorders can affect functional structures in the head and neck area, the technology bears high therapeutic potential in otorhinolaryngology.

objectiveIn this article, we summarize the concept of CRISPR-Cas9-based therapies, recent achievements in preclinical applications, and future challenges for the implementation of this technology in otolaryngology. MATERIALS AND

methodsGenetic targeting strategies were analyzed or established using genome sequencing data derived from online databases and literature.

resultsRecent research on animal models has shown that genome editing can be used to treat genetic diseases by specifically targeting mutant genomic loci. For example, one preclinical study in the field of otolaryngology has demonstrated that inherited autosomal dominant deafness in mice can be treated using CRISPR-Cas9. Moreover, the same strategies can be used to establish applications for the treatment of head and neck cancer. The greatest challenge appears to be establishment of a system for the safe and efficient delivery of therapeutic nucleotides in clinics.

conclusionsIn theory, genome editing could be used in otolaryngology to target disease-causing genomic loci specifically. However, various challenges have to be overcome until applications can be used clinically.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingOtolaryngologyAnimalsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsGene TargetingHumansMiceCRISPR-Cas9Gene therapyHead and neck cancerMutationOncogene

Identifiers

PMID30689007
OpenAlexW2911656647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.