ArticleJAMA neurology2019
Prediction Tools for Psychiatric Adverse Effects After Levetiracetam Prescription.
Article in JAMA neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuropsychiatric Adverse Effects Associated with the Use of Levetiracetam in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of monoclonal antibody therapies on depression in Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Pooled it
- Balancing risks and benefits of cannabis use: umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Pooled it
- Prevalence and Predictors of Psychiatric Comorbidities in Adults with Epilepsy: A Cross-sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Centre.Annals of neurosciences · 2026Article
- Article
- The impact of long-term antiseizure treatment on cognitive decline in late-onset epileptic prodromal Alzheimer's disease: an exploratory study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Modelling risk factors for depressive symptoms in seizure disorders.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- Psychiatric and behavioural side effects of antiseizure medications in epilepsy.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Electroconvulsive therapy in psychoses of epilepsy - A forgotten alternative.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2025Article
- A cross-national cost-effectiveness analysis of brivaracetam focusing on psychiatric and behavioral adverse effects.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Redefining the practical roles of psychiatrists in epilepsy care: A framework for collaboration in Japan.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Review
- Major depression, anxiety disorder and suicidality in epilepsy: What should neurologists do?Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2025Article
- Navigating the depths: A comprehensive narrative review on depression in people with epilepsy.Heliyon · 2025Review
- Pharmacological strategies for preventing post-stroke seizures and epilepsy.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- The relationship between psychiatric symptoms and the use of levetiracetam in people with epilepsy.International journal of psychiatry in medicine · 2024Article
- Mood disorders in adults with epilepsy: a review of unrecognized facts and common misconceptions.Annals of general psychiatry · 2024Review
- Stroke-related epilepsy in the rehabilitation setting: Insights from the inpatient post-stroke rehabilitation study - RIPS.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2024Article
- Assessing the Incidence Rate of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Effects in Older Adults Following Levetiracetam Initiation: A Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Should neurologists treat common psychiatric comorbidities in patients with epilepsy?Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Levetiracetam is a commonly used antiepileptic drug, yet psychiatric adverse effects are common and may lead to treatment discontinuation. Objective: To derive prediction models to estimate the risk of psychiatric adverse effects from levetiracetam use. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective open cohort study. All patients meeting the case definition for epilepsy after the Acceptable Mortality Reporting date in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database based in the United Kingdom (inclusive January 1, 2000, to May 31, 2012) who received a first-ever prescription for levetiracetam were included. Of 11 194 182 patients registered in THIN, this study identified 7400 presumed incident cases (66.1 cases per 100 000 persons) over a maximum of 12 years' follow-up. The index date was when patients received their first prescription code for levetiracetam, and follow-up lasted 2 years or until an event, loss to follow-up, or censoring. The analyses were performed on April 22, 2018. Exposure: A presumed first-ever prescription for levetiracetam. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome of interest was a Read code for any psychiatric sign, symptom, or disorder as reached through consensus by 2 authors. This study used regression techniques to derive 2 prediction models, one for the overall population and one for those without a history of a psychiatric sign, symptom, or disorder during the study period. Results: Among 1173 patients with epilepsy receiving levetiracetam, the overall median age was 39 (interquartile range, 25-56) years, and 590 (50.3%) were female. A total of 14.1% (165 of 1173) experienced a psychiatric symptom or disorder within 2 years of index prescription. The odds of reporting a psychiatric symptom were significantly elevated for women (odds ratio [OR], 1.41; 95% CI, 0.99-2.01; P = .05) and those with a preexposure history of higher social deprivation (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.31; P = .03), depression (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.49-3.24; P < .001), anxiety (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.11-2.72; P = .02), or recreational drug use (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.20-3.37; P = .008). The model performed well after stratified k = 5-fold cross-validation (area under the curve [AUC], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.58-0.79). There was a gradient in risk, with probabilities increasing from 8% for 0 risk factors to 11% to 17% for 1, 17% to 31% for 2, 30% to 42% for 3, and 49% when all risk factors were present. For those free of a preexposure psychiatric code, a second model performed comparably well after k = 5-fold cross-validation (AUC, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.90). Specificity was maximized using threshold cutoffs of 0.10 (full model) and 0.14 (second model); a score below these thresholds indicates safety of prescription. Conclusions and Relevance: This study derived 2 simple models that predict the risk of a psychiatric adverse effect from levetiracetam. These algorithms can be used to guide prescription in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.