Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30687934›Full record

Observational studyAnaesthesia2019

Postoperative microcirculatory perfusion and endothelial glycocalyx shedding following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

N A M Dekker, D Veerhoek, N J Koning, A L I van Leeuwen, P W G Elbers, C E van den Brom, A B A Vonk, C Boer

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Anaesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N A M DekkerDepartments of Anaesthesiology, Physiology, and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
D VeerhoekDepartments of Anaesthesiology, Physiology, and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
N J KoningDepartments of Anaesthesiology, Physiology, and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A L I van LeeuwenDepartments of Anaesthesiology, Physiology, and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
P W G ElbersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Research VUmc Intensive Care (REVIVE), Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C E van den BromDepartments of Anaesthesiology, Physiology, and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A B A VonkDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C BoerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

Dutch Heart Foundation, the Netherlands 2016T064Dutch Society of Anaesthesiologists YIG 2017European Society of Anaesthesiology 2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated microcirculatory perfusion disturbances following cardiopulmonary bypass in the early postoperative period and whether the course of these disturbances mirrored restoration of endothelial glycocalyx integrity. We performed sublingual sidestream dark field imaging of the microcirculation during the first three postoperative days in patients who had undergone on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. We calculated the perfused vessel density, proportion of perfused vessels and perfused boundary region. Plasma was obtained to measure heparan sulphate and syndecan-1 levels as glycocalyx shedding markers. We recruited 17 patients; the mean (SD) duration of non-pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass was 103 (18) min, following which 491 (29) ml autologous blood was transfused through cell salvage. Cardiopulmonary bypass immediately decreased both microcirculatory perfused vessel density; 11 (3) vs. 16 (4) mm.mm

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary BypassAgedBiomarkersCardiac Surgical ProceduresEndothelium, VascularFemaleGlycocalyxHemoglobinsHeparan SulfateHumansMaleMicrocirculationMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodProspective StudiesSyndecan-1BiomarkersHemoglobinsHeparan SulfateSDC1 protein, humanSyndecan-1blood oxygen transport, oxygen delivery to tissues: factors impactingcardiopulmonary bypass managementendothelial glycocalyxmicrocirculation

Identifiers

PMID30687934
PMCPMC6590376
OpenAlexW2914193534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.