Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30687893›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2019

Voriconazole: A Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses.

Changcheng Shi, Yubo Xiao, Yong Mao, Jing Wu, Nengming Lin

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. [A precision medication study of atomoxetine in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder:Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. The impact ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Changcheng ShiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yubo XiaoDepartment of Pharmacometrics, Mosim Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Yong MaoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jing WuDepartment of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Pharmaceutical College, Ningbo, China.
Nengming LinDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Translational Medicine Research Center, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 261 Huansha Road, Hangzhou, 310006, China. lnm1013@163.com.
Hangzhou First People's Hospital · CNZhejiang Pharmaceutical College · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous population pharmacokinetic studies on voriconazole have been conducted in recent years. This review aimed to comprehensively summarize the population pharmacokinetic models for voriconazole and to determine which covariates have been identified and which remain to be explored. We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases from inception to March 2018 for population pharmacokinetic analyses of voriconazole using the nonlinear mixed-effect method. A total of 16 studies were included in this review, of which 11 models were described in adult populations, four were described in pediatric populations, and the remaining study included both adult and pediatric populations. The absorption profiles of voriconazole in both adult and pediatric studies were best described as first-order absorption models. The typical distribution volumes were similar in adult and pediatric patients, but the estimated clearances in pediatric patients were significantly higher than those in adult patients. The most commonly identified covariates were body weight, the cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype, liver function, and concomitant medications. Only one study evaluated the model using an external method. Further population pharmacokinetic studies on pediatric patients aged younger than 2 years are warranted. Furthermore, new or controversial potential covariates, such as inflammation, the cytochrome P450 3A4 genotype, concomitant medications (particularly various types and dosages of proton pump inhibitors and glucocorticoids), and various measures of body weight, should be tested because the unexplained variability remains relatively high. In addition, previously published models should be externally evaluated, and the predictive performance of the various models should be compared.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAntifungal AgentsChildCytochrome P-450 CYP3AGenotypeHumansLiverVoriconazoleYoung AdultAntifungal AgentsCYP3A4 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP3AVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID30687893
OpenAlexW2912847294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.