Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30687729›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in applied mathematics and statistics2018

Methods for measuring swallowing pressure variability using high-resolution manometry.

Corinne A Jones, Ellen L Meisner, Courtney K Broadfoot, Sarah P Rosen, Christine R Samuelsen, Timothy M McCulloch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in applied mathematics and statistics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deglutition and the Regulation of the Swallow Motor Pattern.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023 · on this map
    Review
  5. Pharyngeal Pressure Variability During Volitional Swallowing Maneuvers.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Corinne A JonesDepartment of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Ellen L MeisnerDepartment of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Courtney K BroadfootDepartment of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Sarah P RosenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Christine R SamuelsenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Timothy M McCullochDepartment of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

University of Wisconsin Voice Research Training Program (T32)T32DC009401 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Susan Lynn Thibeault · 2009 to 2026
$6.3M
High Resolution Manometry: A Novel Pattern Recognition Method for DysphagiaR21DC011130 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MCCULLOCH, TIMOTHY M · 2011 to 2012
$398k
Contribution of the parietal cortex to auditory-stream perceptionF32DC015709 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI RODRIGUEZ CAMPOS, FRANCISCO A · 2016 to 2016
$65k
Multimodal clinical assessment of early cranial motor deficits in Parkinson's diseaseF31DC015706 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JONES, CORINNE ARIEL · 2017 to 2018
$54k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC015706NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC015709NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC011130NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC009401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Any movement performed repeatedly will be executed with inter-trial variability. Oropharyngeal swallowing is a complex sensorimotor action, and swallow-to-swallow variability can have consequences that impact swallowing safety. Our aim was to determine an appropriate method to measure swallowing pressure waveform variability. An ideal variability metric must be sensitive to known deviations in waveform amplitude, duration, and overall shape, without being biased by waveforms that have both positive and sub-atmospheric pressure profiles. Through systematic analysis of model waveforms, we found a coefficient of variability (CV) parameter on waveforms adjusted such that the overall mean was 0 to be best suited for swallowing pressure variability analysis. We then investigated pharyngeal swallowing pressure variability using high-resolution manometry data from healthy individuals to assess impacts of waveform alignment, pharyngeal region, and number of swallows investigated. The alignment that resulted in the lowest overall swallowing pressure variability was when the superior-most sensor in the upper esophageal sphincter reached half its maximum pressure. Pressures in the tongue base region of the pharynx were least variable and pressures in the hypopharynx region were most variable. Sets of 3 - 10 consecutive swallows had no overall difference in variability, but sets of 2 swallows resulted in significantly less variability than the other dataset sizes. This study identified variability in swallowing pressure waveform shape throughout the pharynx in healthy adults; we discuss implications for swallowing motor control.

Indexed as

deglutitionhigh-resolution manometrypharyngeal pressurepressurevariability

Identifiers

PMID30687729
PMCPMC6345545
OpenAlexW2806044166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.