Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30687710›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2018

Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita: The 2019 Update.

Hiroshi Koga, Catherine Prost-Squarcioni, Hiroaki Iwata, Marcel F Jonkman, Ralf J Ludwig, Katja Bieber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. European S2k guidelines on management of autoimmune blistering diseases in children and adolescents.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Incidence of P200 pemphigoid: A nationwide study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Meeting Report on "10th Anniversary Symposium on Inflammatory Skin Disease".JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Rituximab in the Treatment of Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita: A Systematic Review.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hiroshi KogaDepartment of Dermatology, Kurume University School of Medicine, and Kurume University Institute of Cutaneous Cell Biology, Fukuoka, Japan.
Catherine Prost-SquarcioniDepartment of Dermatology, APHP, Avicenne Hospital, Referral Center for Autoimmune Bullous Diseases, Bobigny, France.
Hiroaki IwataDepartment of Dermatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Marcel F JonkmanDepartment of Dermatology, Center for Blistering Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Ralf J LudwigLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Katja BieberLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) is an orphan autoimmune disease. Patients with EBA suffer from chronic inflammation as well as blistering and scarring of the skin and mucous membranes. Current treatment options rely on non-specific immunosuppression, which in many cases, does not lead to a remission of treatment. Hence, novel treatment options are urgently needed for the care of EBA patients. During the past decade, decisive clinical observations, and frequent use of pre-clinical model systems have tremendously increased our understanding of EBA pathogenesis. Herein, we review all of the aspects of EBA, starting with a detailed description of epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and current treatment options. Of note, pattern analysis via direct immunofluorescence microscopy of a perilesional skin lesion and novel serological test systems have significantly facilitated diagnosis of the disease. Next, a state-of the art review of the current understanding of EBA pathogenesis, emerging treatments and future perspectives is provided. Based on pre-clinical model systems, cytokines and kinases are among the most promising therapeutic targets, whereas high doses of IgG (IVIG) and the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab are among the most promising "established" EBA therapeutics. We also aim to raise awareness of EBA, as well as initiate basic and clinical research in this field, to further improve the already improved but still unsatisfactory conditions for those diagnosed with this condition.

Indexed as

animal modelsdiagnosisepidermolysis bullosa acquisitapathogenesistreatment

Identifiers

PMID30687710
PMCPMC6335340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.