Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30687685›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2018

Controversies on Timing of Sex Assignment and Surgery in Individuals With Disorders of Sex Development: A Perspective.

Tatiana Prade Hemesath, Leila Cristina Pedroso de Paula, Clarissa Gutierrez Carvalho, Julio Cesar Loguercio Leite, Guilherme Guaragna-Filho, Eduardo Corrêa Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tatiana Prade HemesathPADS DSD Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Leila Cristina Pedroso de PaulaPADS DSD Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Clarissa Gutierrez CarvalhoPADS DSD Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Julio Cesar Loguercio LeitePADS DSD Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Guilherme Guaragna-FilhoPADS DSD Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Eduardo Corrêa CostaPADS DSD Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Appropriate management of disorders of sex development (DSD) has been a matter of discussion since the first guidelines were published in the 1950s. In the last decade, with the advent of the 2006 consensus, the classical methods, especially regarding timing of surgery and sex of rearing, are being questioned. In our culture, parents of DSD newborns usually want their children to undergo genital surgery as soon as possible after sexual assignment, as surgery helps them to confirm the assigned sex. Developmental psychology theories back this hypothesis. They state that anatomic differences between sexes initiate the very important process of identification with the parent of the same sex. Sex-related endocrinological issues also demand early care. For example, using dihydrotestosterone cream to increase penile length or growth hormone treatment to improve final height require intervention at young ages to obtain better results. Although the timing of surgery remains controversial, recent evidence suggests that male reconstruction should be performed between 6 and 18 months of age. Feminizing surgery is still somewhat controversial. Most guidelines agree that severe virilization requires surgical intervention, while no consensus exists regarding mild cases. Our perspective is that precocious binary sex assignment and early surgery is a better management method. There is no strong evidence for delays and the consequences can be catastrophic in adulthood.

Indexed as

disorders of sex developmentgender identitypsychosocial caresex assignmentsurgerytiming

Identifiers

PMID30687685
PMCPMC6335325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.