Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30687678›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health research2018

Social egg freezing under public health perspective: Just a medical reality or a women's right? An ethical case analysis.

Ana Borovecki, Pamela Tozzo, Nicoletta Cerri, Luciana Caenazzo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. International attitudes towards medical and planned oocyte cryopreservation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024
    Article
  8. Social Egg Freezing-A Trend or Modern Reality?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Oocyte Biobanks: Old Assumptions and New Challenges.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2021
    Article
  17. Use ofUpsala journal of medical sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana BoroveckiAndrija Štampar School of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia.
Pamela TozzoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padua, Italy.
Nicoletta CerriLegal Medicine Unit, ASST, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Luciana CaenazzoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, a social trend toward delaying childbearing has been observed in women of reproductive age. A novel technomedical innovation was commercialized for non-medical reasons to healthy, ostensibly fertile women, who wished to postpone motherhood for various reasons such as educational or career demands, or because they had not yet found a partner. As a consequence, these women may be affected by age-related infertility when they decide to conceive, and fertility preservation techniques can be obtained through the so-called

Indexed as

egg bankingethicsgender perspectiveoocyte donationsocial freezing

Identifiers

PMID30687678
PMCPMC6321944
OpenAlexW2905860387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.