ArticleJournal of public health research2018
Perceptions of health professionals about the quality of communication and deliberation with the patient and its impact on the health decision making process.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Learning Teach-Back in clinical practice: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Patient experiences and unmet needs in diagnosis and treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a US survey.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Multilevel barriers and facilitators of shared decision-making in chronic illness management: a social ecological model approach.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Patient-centred communication in primary care: are general practitioners aware of their strengths and areas for improvement?Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Whose voice counts? Family caregivers' roles in shared decision making for chronic illness in urban South Korea: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Lessons in leadership: Developing a longitudinal evidence-based teaching curriculum on professionalism in healthcare.Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management · 2025Article
- When HIPAA hurts: legal barriers to texting may reinforce healthcare disparities and disenfranchise vulnerable patients.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Review
- Agenda Setting in Outpatient Consultation of Older Adults With Long-COVID.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Experiences and opinions towards baby-led weaning by healthcare professionals. A qualitative study.Pediatric research · 2023Article
- Essential Skills for Health Communication, Barriers, Facilitators and the Need for Training: Perceptions of Healthcare Professionals from Seven European Countries.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Utilizing the "teach-back" method to improve surgical informed consent and shared decision-making: a review.Patient safety in surgery · 2022Review
- Article
- Tobacco smoking, related harm and motivation to quit smoking in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.Health psychology research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The information process is considered a core element in decision- making and an obligatory matter of concern for the health professional. Rather than information
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.