Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30687631›Full record

ReviewGland surgery2018

Accelerated partial breast radiotherapy: a review of the literature and future directions.

Nathan R Bennion, Michael Baine, Andrew Granatowicz, Andrew O Wahl

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Effectiveness and safety of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with low-energy X-rays (INTRABEAMClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan R BennionDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fred & Pamela Buffet Cancer Center at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Michael BaineDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fred & Pamela Buffet Cancer Center at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Andrew GranatowiczNebraska Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Andrew O WahlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fred & Pamela Buffet Cancer Center at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · USNebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast conservation therapy exemplifies the tailoring of medicine in the care of patients with cancer. Akin to improvements in surgical approaches, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) tailors the treatment volume and duration to the needs of well selected patients. Here, we examine the evidence supporting APBI as well as the lessons in patient selection, dose and delivery techniques. Examination of historical techniques and their associated outcomes will support more correct patient selection and treatment delivery in an era where we await the reports of several large prospective trials.

Indexed as

accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI)brachytherapyBreast cancerbreast conservationradiotherapytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID30687631
PMCPMC6323254
OpenAlexW2902235868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.