ReviewGland surgery2018
Update of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Toolbox to address the lumpectomy reoperation epidemic.
Review in Gland surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgeon interpretation of margin status utilizing intraoperative 3D tomosynthesis during breast-conserving surgery.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Performance of an AI-powered visualization software platform for precision surgery in breast cancer patients.NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
- Cost minimization in breast conserving surgery: a comparative study of radiofrequency spectroscopy and full cavity shave margins.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2023Article
- Article
- Positive surgical margins after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in-situ: does histologic grade or estrogen receptor status matter?Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
- Article
- Economic Impact of Reducing Reexcision Rates after Breast-Conserving Surgery in a Large, Integrated Health System.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Assessment of photoacoustic tomography contrast for breast tissue imaging using 3D correlative virtual histology.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Value of Repeated Breast Surgery as a Quality Indicator in Breast Cancer Care.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Reoperation rate after breast conserving surgery as quality indicator in breast cancer treatment: A reappraisal.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020Article
- Revisiting the modern toolkit to optimize breast conservation surgery.Gland surgery · 2020Article
- Factors Associated with Reoperation in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer: A Prospective Study of American Society of Breast Surgeon Members.Annals of surgical oncology · 2019Article
- Future perspectives for breast conservation treatment: science & art.Gland surgery · 2018Article
- Re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer: an Albertan perspective.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2015, the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) convened a multidisciplinary consensus conference, the Collaborative Attempt to Lower Lumpectomy Reoperation Rates (CALLER). The CALLER conference endorsed a "toolbox" of multiple processes of care for which there was evidence that they were associated with fewer reoperations. We present an update of the toolbox taking into consideration the latest advances in decreasing re excision rates. In this review, we performed a comprehensive review of the literature from 2015-2018 using search terms for each tool. The original ten tools were updated with the latest evidence from the literature and our strength of recommendation. We added an additional section looking at new tools and techniques that may provide more accurate intraoperative assessment of margins. The updates on the CALLER Toolbox for lumpectomy will help guide surgeons to various resources to aid in the removal of breast cancer, while being aware of cosmesis and decreasing re excision rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.