Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30687532›Full record

ArticleTobacco induced diseases2018

ENDS retailers and marketing near university campuses with and without tobacco-free policies.

Dianne C Barker, Nina C Schleicher, Kimberly Ababseh, Trent O Johnson, Lisa Henriksen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Spatial Clustering of Hookah Lounges, Vape Shops, and All Tobacco Retailers Near Colleges.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dianne C BarkerPublic Health Institute, 555 12 Street 10 Floor, Oakland, CA 94607 dcbarker@earthlink.net.
Nina C SchleicherStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford School of Medicine, 3300 Hillview Avenue, suite 120, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Kimberly AbabsehStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford School of Medicine, 3300 Hillview Avenue, suite 120, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Trent O JohnsonStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford School of Medicine, 3300 Hillview Avenue, suite 120, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Lisa HenriksenStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford School of Medicine, 3300 Hillview Avenue, suite 120, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Public Health Institute · US

Funding

Retail Environment for Tobacco and Marijuana in California: Impact on College Student UseR01CA217165 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HENRIKSEN, LISA ANNE · 2018 to 2023
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA217165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study characterizes the retail environment for Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) near public universities in California, assesses marketing in the first random sample of ENDS retailers, and compares ENDS retailer density and retail marketing near campuses with and without tobacco-free policies.

methodsTwo data sources were used to construct a sampling frame of possible ENDS retailers, which were mapped within 1 to 4 miles of the 33 University of California and California State University campuses. To assess retailer density, a telephone survey of possible ENDS retailers (n=1186) determined which sold e-cigarettes or e-liquids (completion rate=72.9%). To assess retail marketing, trained data collectors completed observations in a random sample (n=438, M=13.3 stores per campus, SD=11.2) in fall 2015.

resultsIn a telephone survey, 59.1% of retailers reported selling e-cigarettes or e-liquids. Half of the campuses had 10 or more ENDS retailers nearby. Most ENDS retailers were convenience stores (42.5%), and more were head shops (8.4%) than smoke shops (6.8%) or vape shops (6.2%). Nearly half (43.6%) of ENDS retailers sold products marketed as zero-nicotine and 13.9% sold NRT. ENDS advertising was visible in 72.1% and on the exterior of 28.1% of retailers. However, the presence of exterior advertising for ENDS was significantly lower near campuses with established tobacco-free policies than campuses with recent or no tobacco-free policies (OR=0.45, 95% CI=0.22, 0.94).

conclusionsThe large number of tobacco retailers that sell ENDS near colleges suggests a need for better monitoring and regulations of ENDS availability and marketing. The widespread availability of zero-nicotine products suggests a need to examine whether nicotine-free products are as advertised and safe to use. Longitudinal research is needed to understand how retail marketing for ENDS responds to change in tobacco-free policies at nearby campuses.

Indexed as

electronic cigarettesENDS retail marketingtobacco-free college campusesyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID30687532
PMCPMC6342456
OpenAlexW2897585116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.