ArticleCurrent health sciences journal
Blood Coagulation Following an Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Article in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary Embolism in Acute Ischaemic Stroke: Evolving Evidence, Diagnostic Challenges, and a Novel Thromboinflammatory Axis Hypothesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Ivermectin's neuroprotective effects decrease with prolonged use after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion.Metabolic brain disease · 2025Article
- The interaction effect of transfusion history and previous stroke history on the risk of venous thromboembolism in stroke patients: a prospective cohort study.Thrombosis journal · 2023Article
- Circulating Biomarkers in Long-Term Stroke Prognosis: A Scoping Review Focusing on the South African Setting.Cureus · 2022Article
- A novel cascade allows Metarhizium robertsii to distinguish cuticle and hemocoel microenvironments during infection of insects.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Optical coherence tomography microscopy in experimental traumatic brain injury.Microscopy research and technique · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHemostasis is a complex physiological process that stops bleeding at the site of a vascular injury. Although the majority of vascular accidents are ischemic, the role of hypercoagulable state and stroke needs further investigation. MATERIALS AND
methodsFresh whole blood was taken from 61 acute ischemic stroke patients and compared to 18 healthy subjects and investigated with optical coherence tomography imaging after initiating coagulation. We used an OCT1300SS system (Thorlabs) and did 3D scans. We then processed the images with ImageJ. For each image mean, integrated density, skewness and kurtosis of gray values were analyzed.
resultsMean gray value and integrated intensity of sampled data showed an intrinsic difference detected with OCT. This difference was further confirmed by the data distribution analysis.
conclusionsResults suggest, that normal blood coagulation, is not a random reaction while in the case of stroke patients, the relatively symmetrical distribution of gray values brings coagulation closer randomized process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.