ReviewFrontiers in genetics2018
Genomic Selection and Use of Molecular Tools in Breeding Programs for Indigenous and Crossbred Cattle in Developing Countries: Current Status and Future Prospects.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating longitudinal metabolite profiles improves phenotype prediction in pigs in a trait- and timepoint-dependent manner.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Methane emissions in beef cattle: A review of measurements and mitigation strategies.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
- Weighted Single-Step Genomic Evaluation of Body Structural Traits for Early Selection of Growth Performance in Thai Swamp Buffalo.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Integrating biomarkers and artificial intelligence for precision diagnostics in cattle health and herd management: a review.Veterinary research communications · 2026Review
- Analysis and socioeconomic determinants of the livestock sector in Afghanistan.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Review
- Evaluating Adjusted ssGBLUP Models for Genomic Prediction and Matrix Compatibility in South African Holstein Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Haemoglobin polymorphism in different blood levels of Ethiopian Zebu x Holstein Friesian crossbred dairy cattle.PloS one · 2026Article
- Emerging livestock science and technologies can drastically alter the projections of global food security models.Discover sustainability · 2026Review
- Integrating Longitudinal Metabolite Profiles Improves Trait Prediction in Pigs in a Trait- and Timepoint-Dependent Manner.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The Use of Selected Machine Learning Methods in Dairy Cattle Farming: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Variable selection strategies for genomic prediction of growth and carcass related traits in experimental Nellore cattle herds under different selection criteria.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genomic Prediction of Milk Fat Percentage Among Crossbred Cattle in the Indian Subcontinent.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- The African Animal Breeding Network as a pathway towards genetic improvement of livestock.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Evaluation of crossbreeding strategies for improved adaptation and productivity in African smallholder cattle farms.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Performance of weighted genomic BLUP and Bayesian methods for Hanwoo carcass traits.Tropical animal health and production · 2025Article
- Time to link camel genomics and traits by bridging the phenotypic gap.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Genome-wide local ancestry and the functional consequences of admixture in African and European cattle populations.Heredity · 2025Article
- A2 Milk: The Impact of Genetic Variation in Milk Protein on Human Health.Current protein & peptide science · 2025Review
- Genetic estimates and genome-wide association studies of antibody response in Tanzanian dairy cattle.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Integrating Genomic Selection and a Genome-Wide Association Study to Improve Days Open in Thai Dairy Holstein Cattle: A Comprehensive Genetic Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) has resulted in rapid rates of genetic gains especially in dairy cattle in developed countries resulting in a higher proportion of genomically proven young bulls being used in breeding. This success has been undergirded by well-established conventional genetic evaluation systems. Here, the status of GS in terms of the structure of the reference and validation populations, response variables, genomic prediction models, validation methods, and imputation efficiency in breeding programs of developing countries, where smallholder systems predominate and the basic components for conventional breeding are mostly lacking is examined. Also, the application of genomic tools and identification of genome-wide signatures of selection is reviewed. The studies on genomic prediction in developing countries are mostly in dairy and beef cattle usually with small reference populations (500-3,000 animals) and are mostly cows. The input variables tended to be pre-corrected phenotypic records and the small reference populations has made implementation of various Bayesian methods feasible in addition to GBLUP. Multi-trait single-step has been used to incorporate genomic information from foreign bulls, thus GS in developing countries would benefit from collaborations with developed countries, as many dairy sires used are from developed countries where they may have been genotyped and phenotyped. Cross validation approaches have been implemented in most studies resulting in accuracies of 0.20-0.60. Genotyping animals with a mixture of HD and LD chips, followed by imputation to the HD have been implemented with imputation accuracies of 0.74-0.99 reported. This increases the prospects of reducing genotyping costs and hence the cost-effectiveness of GS. Next-generation sequencing and associated technologies have allowed the determination of breed composition, parent verification, genome diversity, and genome-wide selection sweeps. This information can be incorporated into breeding programs aiming to utilize GS. Cost-effective GS in beef cattle in developing countries may involve usage of reproductive technologies (AI and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.