ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018
Deconstructing Procedural Memory: Different Learning Trajectories and Consolidation of Sequence and Statistical Learning.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differences in characteristics of two aspects of procedural learning in action video game players.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Neural Associative Skill Memories for Safer Robotics and Modeling Human Sensorimotor Repertoires.Neural computation · 2025Article
- Article
- Mind Wandering during Implicit Learning Is Associated with Increased Periodic EEG Activity and Improved Extraction of Hidden Probabilistic Patterns.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Neural representations of statistical and rule-based predictions in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- The complexity of measuring reliability in learning tasks: An illustration using the Alternating Serial Reaction Time Task.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- A neurophysiological perspective on the integration between incidental learning and cognitive control.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Lifespan developmental invariance in memory consolidation: evidence from procedural memory.PNAS nexus · 2023Article
- A failure of sleep-dependent consolidation of visuoperceptual procedural learning in young adults with ADHD.Translational psychiatry · 2022Article
- Tracking human skill learning with a hierarchical Bayesian sequence model.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Speed and accuracy instructions affect two aspects of skill learning differently.NPJ science of learning · 2022Article
- Day versus night consolidation of implicit sequence learning using manual and oculomotor activation versions of the serial reaction time task: reaction time and anticipation measures.Psychological research · 2022Article
- Overnight changes to dual-memory processes reflected in speech-perceptual performance.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Neurophysiological and functional neuroanatomical coding of statistical and deterministic rule information during sequence learning.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Statistical and sequence learning lead to persistent memory in children after a one-year offline period.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
- 'Sleep-dependent' memory consolidation? Brief periods of post-training rest and sleep provide an equivalent benefit for both declarative and procedural memory.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- A Process-Oriented View of Procedural Memory Can Help Better Understand Tourette's Syndrome.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Review
- Regularity detection under stress: Faster extraction of probability-based regularities.PloS one · 2021Article
- Processing Verb Meanings and the Declarative/Procedural Model: A Developmental Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Assessing the efficacy of tablet-based simulations for learning pseudo-surgical instrumentation.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Procedural learning is a fundamental cognitive function that facilitates efficient processing of and automatic responses to complex environmental stimuli. Here, we examined training-dependent and off-line changes of two sub-processes of procedural learning: namely, sequence learning and statistical learning. Whereas sequence learning requires the acquisition of order-based relationships between the elements of a sequence, statistical learning is based on the acquisition of probabilistic associations between elements. Seventy-eight healthy young adults (58 females and 20 males) completed the modified version of the Alternating Serial Reaction Time task that was designed to measure Sequence and Statistical Learning simultaneously. After training, participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: active wakefulness, quiet rest, or daytime sleep. We examined off-line changes in Sequence and Statistical Learning as well as further improvements after extended practice. Performance in Sequence Learning increased during training, while Statistical Learning plateaued relatively rapidly. After the off-line period, both the acquired sequence and statistical knowledge was preserved, irrespective of the vigilance state (awake, quiet rest or sleep). Sequence Learning further improved during extended practice, while Statistical Learning did not. Moreover, within the sleep group, cortical oscillations and sleep spindle parameters showed differential associations with Sequence and Statistical Learning. Our findings can contribute to a deeper understanding of the dynamic changes of multiple parallel learning and consolidation processes that occur during procedural memory formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.