ReviewFrontiers in systems neuroscience2018
Memory Integration as a Challenge to the Consolidation/Reconsolidation Hypothesis: Similarities, Differences and Perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of reactivations during consolidation in the structure and accessibility of episodic autobiographical memories.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Memory updating and the structure of event representations.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025Review
- Proust and involuntary retrieval.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- The time window of reconsolidation: A replication.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022Article
- Can Forgetting Be Due to Changes in Engram Cell Plasticity?Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Understanding the dynamic and destiny of memories.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- Short-term memory reactivation of a weak CS-US association promotes long-term memory persistence in conditioned odor aversion.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Mechanisms of Memory Updating: State Dependency vs. Reconsolidation.Journal of cognition · 2021Article
- Emotional remodeling with oxytocin durably rescues trauma-induced behavioral and neuro-morphological changes in rats: a promising treatment for PTSD.Translational psychiatry · 2020Article
- Reactivation of the Unconditioned Stimulus Inhibits the Return of Fear Independent of Cortisol.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
- Retrograde amnesia for the stress-induced impairment of extinction: time-dependent and not so forgotten.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We recently proposed that retrograde amnesia does not result from a disruption of the consolidation/reconsolidation processes but rather to the integration of the internal state induced by the amnesic treatment within the initial memory. Accordingly, the performance disruption induced by an amnesic agent does not result from a disruption of the memory fixation process, but from a difference in the internal state present during the learning phase (or reactivation) and at the later retention test: a case of state-dependency. In the present article, we will review similarities and differences these two competing views may have on memory processing. We will also consider the consequences the integration concept may have on the way memory is built, maintained and retrieved, as well as future research perspectives that such a new view may generate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.