Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30687030›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2018

A Key Role for Subiculum-Fornix Connectivity in Recollection in Older Age.

Naomi Hartopp, Paul Wright, Nicola J Ray, Tavia E Evans, Claudia Metzler-Baddeley, John P Aggleton, Michael J O'Sullivan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diencephalic integrity explains aspects of hippocampal amnesia.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Structure-Function Dissociations of Human Hippocampal Subfield Stiffness and Memory Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Naomi HartoppDivision of Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul WrightDivision of Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nicola J RayDepartment of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Tavia E EvansDivision of Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Claudia Metzler-BaddeleySchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
John P AggletonSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Michael J O'SullivanDivision of Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBCardiff University · GBErasmus MC · NLManchester Metropolitan University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K022113/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual differences in memory during aging are associated with the microstructure of the fornix, a bidirectional tract connecting the hippocampus with the diencephalon, basal forebrain and cortex. To investigate the origin of alterations in fornix microstructure, measurement of hippocampal subfield volumes was combined with diffusion MRI and cognitive evaluation in a new sample of 31 healthy human participants aged 50-89 years. The fornix, uncinate and parahippocampal cingulum were reconstructed using diffusion MRI tractography. Episodic memory was assessed with free and cued verbal recall, visual recognition and paired associate learning tests. Recall performance was associated with fornix microstructure and hippocampal subfield volumes. Subiculum and CA1 volumes remained positively associated with fornix microstructure when controlling for other volumes. Subiculum volume was also associated with fornix microstructure independent of age. Regression analyses showed that subiculum-fornix associations explained more variation in recall than that of CA1-fornix associations. In a multivariable regression model, age and subiculum volume were independent predictors of free recall whilst fornix microstructure and CA1 volume were not. These results suggest that age-related changes in a network that includes the subiculum and fornix are important in cognitive change in healthy aging. These results match anatomical predictions concerning the importance of hippocampal - diencephalic projections for memory.

Indexed as

agingfornixhippocampusmemorymicrostructureMRIsubfieldssubiculum

Identifiers

PMID30687030
PMCPMC6335321
OpenAlexW2910635165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.