Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30686996›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018

Machine Learning Models for Multiparametric Glioma Grading With Quantitative Result Interpretations.

Xiuying Wang, Dingqian Wang, Zhigang Yao, Bowen Xin, Bao Wang, Chuanjin Lan, Yejun Qin, Shangchen Xu, Dazhong He, Yingchao Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Combining Radiology and Pathology for Automatic Glioma Classification.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiuying WangSchool of Information Technologies, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Dingqian WangSchool of Information Technologies, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Zhigang YaoDepartment of Pathology, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Bowen XinSchool of Information Technologies, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Bao WangSchool of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Chuanjin LanSchool of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yejun QinDepartment of Pathology, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Shangchen XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Dazhong HeSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Yingchao LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliomas are the most common primary malignant brain tumors in adults. Accurate grading is crucial as therapeutic strategies are often disparate for different grades and may influence patient prognosis. This study aims to provide an automated glioma grading platform on the basis of machine learning models. In this paper, we investigate contributions of multi-parameters from multimodal data including imaging parameters or features from the Whole Slide images (WSI) and the proliferation marker Ki-67 for automated brain tumor grading. For each WSI, we extract both visual parameters such as morphology parameters and sub-visual parameters including first-order and second-order features. On the basis of machine learning models, our platform classifies gliomas into grades II, III, and IV. Furthermore, we quantitatively interpret and reveal the important parameters contributing to grading with the Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) algorithm. The quantitative analysis and explanation may assist clinicians to better understand the disease and accordingly to choose optimal treatments for improving clinical outcomes. The performance of our grading model was evaluated with cross-validation, which randomly divided the patients into non-overlapping training and testing sets and repeatedly validated the model on the different testing sets. The primary results indicated that this modular platform approach achieved the highest grading accuracy of 0.90 ± 0.04 with support vector machine (SVM) algorithm, with grading accuracies of 0.91 ± 0.08, 0.90 ± 0.08, and 0.90 ± 0.07 for grade II, III, and IV gliomas, respectively.

Indexed as

digital pathology imagesglioma gradingmachine learningmorphological featuressupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID30686996
PMCPMC6337068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.