ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2019
Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05542030 (Accuracy of CAD Eye in the Detection of Colonic Remaining Lesions After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Accuracy of CAD Eye in the Detection of Colonic Remaining Lesions After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: a Pilot Study
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic full-thickness resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Significance of Sarcopenia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of salvage endoscopy in the treatment of residual or recurrent colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Risk factors for delayed colorectal postpolypectomy bleeding: a meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Surgical resection after endoscopic resection in patients with T1 colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- Therapeutic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Pediatric Gastroenterology.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of the different endoscopic resection methods for 10- to 20-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and pooled analysis.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationPooled it
- Controlled hypertension under hemostasis prevents post-gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
- Effect of enriched environment on postoperative sleep and recovery quality in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer and precursor lesions: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Rates of colorectal surgery in patients with non-malignant colorectal polyps: Results from a nationwide study.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Multistaged endoscopic full-thickness resection using full-thickness resection device for large recurrent polyp: a case report.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2025Article
- Effect of family history on detection of adenomas and sessile serrated lesions in individuals aged 40s.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Advancements in endoscopic closure techniques for gastrointestinal luminal defects comparative perspectives on OTSC, endo suturing, TTS clips, and X-Tack.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Dexmedetomidine as an Adjunctive Sedative in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.ASIDE gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Current Trends in the Management of a Complex Polyp: Endoscopy versus Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025Review
- Tumor associated chromosomal instability drives colorectal adenoma to adenocarcinoma progression based on 17 year follow up evidence.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Perforation in Endoscopic Treatment for Early Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide ENTER-K Study.Gut and liver · 2025Article
- Assessing outcomes of full-thickness resection in piecemeal polypectomy scar consolidation of colon adenomas containing cancer.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are the established treatment standards for colorectal polyps. Current research aims at the reduction of both complication and recurrence rates as well as on shortening procedure times. Cold snare resection is the emerging standard for the treatment of smaller (< 5mm) polyps and is possibly also suitable for the removal of non-cancerous polyps up to 9 mm. The method avoids thermal damage, has reduced procedure times and probably also a lower risk for delayed bleeding. On the other end of the treatment spectrum, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) offers
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.