Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30686583›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2019

Alterations in Systemic and Cognitive Glucocorticoid Sensitivity in Depression.

Allison E Gaffey, Erin C Walsh, Charlotte O Ladd, Roxanne M Hoks, Heather C Abercrombie

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Allison E GaffeyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Erin C WalshDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Charlotte O LaddDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Roxanne M HoksDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Heather C AbercrombieDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: heather.abercrombie@wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USYale University · US

Funding

North Carolina Translational and Clinical Science Institute (NC TraCS) KL2KL2TR002490 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WEINBERGER, MORRIS · 2018 to 2022
$11.0M
Learning, neural signaling of cortisol, and early adversity in depressionR01MH094478 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ABERCROMBIE, HEATHER C · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002490NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecades of research point to cortisol insensitivity as a biomarker of depression. Despite a vast literature on cortisol's effects on memory, the role of cortisol insensitivity in core psychological features of depression, such as emotional memory biases, is unknown.

methodsSixty-five premenopausal women with varying levels of depression completed this study involving an at-home low-dose dexamethasone suppression test and four experimental sessions (i.e., two visits for memory encoding of emotionally arousing pictures, each of which was followed 48 hours later by a recall test). Participants received 20 mg of oral cortisol (CORT) or placebo prior to encoding. We tested whether systemic cortisol insensitivity measured with the dexamethasone suppression test predicted cognitive sensitivity to CORT, which was operationalized as the change in negatively biased memory formation for pictures encoded following CORT versus placebo administration.

resultsCortisol insensitivity was associated with more severe depression and flatter diurnal cortisol levels. Cortisol insensitivity predicted negative memory bias for pictures encoded during the placebo session and reduction in negative memory bias for pictures encoded during the CORT (compared with placebo) session, even after accounting for psychiatric symptomatology.

conclusionsOur findings replicate research showing that cortisol insensitivity predicts depression severity and flatter diurnal cortisol levels. The results further suggest that systemic cortisol insensitivity is related to negative memory bias and its alleviation by cortisol administration. These novel cognitive findings tie together knowledge regarding endocrine and psychological dysfunction in depression and suggest that boosting cortisol signal may cognitively benefit individuals with cortisol insensitivity.

Indexed as

AdultDepressive DisorderDexamethasoneEmotionsFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneMemoryPremenopauseYoung AdultDexamethasoneHydrocortisoneCortisolDepressionDiurnal cortisol slopeGlucocorticoid insensitivityGlucocorticoid resistanceNegative memory bias

Identifiers

PMID30686583
PMCPMC6399042
OpenAlexW2903270793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.