Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30685775›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of occupational and environmental medicine2019

Development and Validation of the Health Literacy Scale for Workers.

Nemat Azizi, Mahmood Karimy, Rezvan Abedini, Bahram Armoon, Ali Montazeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Corporate Application of Health Literacy.Health literacy research and practice · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Work-Related Health Literacy: A Scoping Review to Clarify the Concept.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nemat AziziSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran.
Mahmood KarimySocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran. karimymahmood@yahoo.com.
Rezvan AbediniSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran.
Bahram ArmoonDepartment of Public Health, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran.
Ali MontazeriDepartment Mental Health Research Group, Health Metrics Research Center, Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth literacy has received growing attention in recent years to reduce health disparities. Health literate individuals can gain access, understand and use health information to maintain, improve and promote good health.

objectiveTo develop and assess the psychometric properties of a tool for the measurement of health literacy among workers, the Health Literacy Scale for Workers (HELSW).

methods15 companies were selected from the factories of the industrial city of Saveh. 450 (400 male and 50 female) workers from Saveh, Iran, were selected through a multistage random sampling. The study had two stages---a qualitative and a quantitative stage. In the qualitative phase, the workers' beliefs were extracted based on 61 in-depth interviews. Content validity was assessed with the help of 12 experts in the field of health education, public health and occupational health. Also, face validity was evaluated through interviewing with 20 workers. In the quantitative phase, the reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated by measuring the internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The construct validity was assessed by the principal component analysis using varimax rotation.

resultsIn the exploratory factor analysis, six domains (

conclusionIt seems that the developed Persian questionnaire, HELSW, is a reliable and valid measure of the health literacy in workers.

Indexed as

AdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMaleOccupational HealthPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth literacyIranPsychometricsReproducibility of resultsSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30685775
PMCPMC6522212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.