Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: safety concerns and no benefits.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

1. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumor: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2022
   Pooled it
2. Functional outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2021
   Pooled it
3. Development and Validation of a CT Radiomics-Deep Learning Model for Predicting Surgical Difficulty in Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors.Cancers · 2025
   Article
4. A more radical perspective on surgical approach and outcomes in pancreatic cancer-a narrative review.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023
   Review
5. Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients: Safety, Efficacy, and Cost Evaluation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
   Article
6. Effect of total laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy on short-term and oncological outcomes: a single-institution comparative study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022
   Article
7. The Landmark Series: Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021
   Article
8. The effectiveness, risks and improvement of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy during the learning curve: a propensity score-matched analysis.Gland surgery · 2020
   Article
9. Comparison of Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Hybrid and Totally Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
   Article
10. A Review on Curability of Cancers: More Efforts for Novel Therapeutic Options Are Needed.Cancers · 2019
    Review
11. Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally-invasive pancreato-biliary surgery: Contemporary experience of a 'self-taught' early adopter in Southeast Asia.Journal of minimal access surgery
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial.2019
• Erratum issued
  Correction to Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4: 186-87.2019

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as