Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30685209›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2019

The Toxin-Antidote Model of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility: Genetics and Evolutionary Implications.

John F Beckmann, Manon Bonneau, Hongli Chen, Mark Hochstrasser, Denis Poinsot, Hervé Merçot, Mylène Weill, Mathieu Sicard, Sylvain Charlat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The facultative intracellular symbiontFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John F BeckmannAuburn University, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, 301 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL 36849, USA; Equal contribution.
Manon BonneauInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), University of Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (EPHE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Montpellier, France; Equal contribution.
Hongli ChenYale University, Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, 266 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Mark HochstrasserYale University, Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, 266 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Denis PoinsotUniversité Rennes 1, Institut de Génétique, Environnement, et Protection des Plantes (IGEPP), Campus Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes, France.
Hervé MerçotSorbonne Université, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Université Paris 06, CNRS, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Evolution Paris Seine (IBPS, EPS), 7-9 Quai St-Bernard, 75005 Paris, France.
Mylène WeillInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), University of Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (EPHE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Montpellier, France.
Mathieu SicardInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), University of Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (EPHE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Montpellier, France. Electronic address: mathieu.sicard@umontpellier.fr.
Sylvain CharlatCNRS, University of Lyon, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, 16 rue Raphael Dubois, 69622 Villeurbanne, France. Electronic address: sylvain.charlat@univ-lyon1.fr.

Funding

FUNCTIONS AND MECHANISMS OF DEUBIQUITINATING ENZYMESR01GM053756 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HOCHSTRASSER, MARK W · 1996 to 2019
$6.5M
Degradation of Short Lived Regulatory Protein in YeastR37GM046904 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HOCHSTRASSER, MARK W · 2009 to 2018
$3.6M
DEGRADTION OF SHORT-LIVED REGULATORY PROTEINS IN YEASTR01GM046904 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HOCHSTRASSER, MARK W · 1992 to 2020
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046904NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM053756NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM046904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wolbachia bacteria inhabit the cells of about half of all arthropod species, an unparalleled success stemming in large part from selfish invasive strategies. Cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI), whereby the symbiont makes itself essential to embryo viability, is the most common of these and constitutes a promising weapon against vector-borne diseases. After decades of theoretical and experimental struggle, major recent advances have been made toward a molecular understanding of this phenomenon. As pieces of the puzzle come together, from yeast and Drosophila fly transgenesis to CI diversity patterns in natural mosquito populations, it becomes clearer than ever that the CI induction and rescue stem from a toxin-antidote (TA) system. Further, the tight association of the CI genes with prophages provides clues to the possible evolutionary origin of this phenomenon and the levels of selection at play.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntidotesArthropodsBacterial ToxinsCulicidaeCytoplasmDrosophilaGene Transfer TechniquesSymbiosisVector Borne DiseasesWolbachiaAntidotesBacterial Toxinscytoplasmic incompatibilitydeubiquitylasenucleaseselfish genetic elementstoxin–antidote systemsWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID30685209
PMCPMC6519454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.