ArticleBiophysical journal2019
Pressure-Temperature Analysis of the Stability of the CTL9 Domain Reveals Hidden Intermediates.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-uniform sampling of similar NMR spectra and its application to studies of the interaction between alpha-synuclein and liposomes.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2023Article
- Inside Out Computational Redesign of Cavities for Improving Thermostability and Catalytic Activity ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Linking Gas-Phase and Solution-Phase Protein Unfolding via Mobile Proton Simulations.Analytical chemistry · 2022Article
- Heat and cold denaturation of yeast frataxin: The effect of pressure.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Monitoring protein unfolding transitions by NMR-spectroscopy.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2022Article
- Protein unfolded states populated at high and ambient pressure are similarly compact.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Pressure and Chemical Unfolding of an α-Helical Bundle Protein: The GH2 Domain of the Protein Adaptor GIPC1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Volume and compressibility differences between protein conformations revealed by high-pressure NMR.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The observation of two-state unfolding for many small single-domain proteins by denaturants has led to speculation that protein sequences may have evolved to limit the population of partially folded states that could be detrimental to fitness. How such strong cooperativity arises from a multitude of individual interactions is not well understood. Here, we investigate the stability and folding cooperativity of the C-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L9 in the pressure-temperature plane using site-specific NMR. In contrast to apparent cooperative unfolding detected with denaturant-induced and thermal-induced unfolding experiments and stopped-flow refolding studies at ambient pressure, NMR-detected pressure unfolding revealed significant deviation from two-state behavior, with a core region that was selectively destabilized by increasing temperature. Comparison of pressure-dependent NMR signals from both the folded and unfolded states revealed the population of at least one invisible excited state at atmospheric pressure. The core destabilizing cavity-creating I98A mutation apparently increased the cooperativity of the loss of folded-state peak intensity while also increasing the population of this invisible excited state present at atmospheric pressure. These observations highlight how local stability is subtly modulated by sequence to tune protein conformational landscapes and illustrate the ability of pressure- and temperature-dependent studies to reveal otherwise hidden states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.