Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30684958›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2019

Study protocol for a multi-methods study: SAVOIR - evaluation of specialized outpatient palliative care (SAPV) in Germany: outcomes, interactions, regional differences.

Antje Freytag, Markus Krause, Anna Bauer, Bianka Ditscheid, Maximiliane Jansky, Sabine Krauss, Thomas Lehmann, Ursula Marschall, Friedemann Nauck, Werner Schneider and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Analysis of radiation oncology integration within general practitioners' daily patient care: a cross-sectional survey in Germany.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Palliative care at the end of life in Germany : Utilization and regional distribution].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Antje FreytagInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Bachstraße 18, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Markus KrauseInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Bachstraße 18, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Anna BauerCenter for Interdisciplinary Health Research, University of Augsburg, Universitätsstraße 2, 86159, Augsburg, Germany.
Bianka DitscheidInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Bachstraße 18, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Maximiliane JanskyClinic for Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Von Siebold-Str. 3, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Sabine KraussCenter for Interdisciplinary Health Research, University of Augsburg, Universitätsstraße 2, 86159, Augsburg, Germany.
Thomas LehmannCenter for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital, Salvador-Allende-Platz 27, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Ursula MarschallDepartment of Medicine and Health Services Research, BARMER Statutory Health Insurance Fund, Lichtscheider Straße 89, 42285, Wuppertal, Germany.
Friedemann NauckClinic for Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Von Siebold-Str. 3, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Werner SchneiderCenter for Interdisciplinary Health Research, University of Augsburg, Universitätsstraße 2, 86159, Augsburg, Germany.
Kathleen StichlingInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Bachstraße 18, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Horst Christian VollmarInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Bachstraße 18, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Ulrich WeddingDepartment of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Winfried MeißnerDepartment of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. winfried.meissner@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2982-7696
SAVOIR Study group
University of Augsburg · DEJena University Hospital · DELMU Klinikum · DENational Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

German Innovation Fund ("Innovationsfond") 01VSF16005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 2007, the German statutory health insurance covers Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care (SAPV). SAPV offers team-based home care for patients with advanced and progressive disease, complex symptoms and life expectancy limited to days, weeks or months. The introduction of SAPV is ruled by a directive (SAPV directive). Within this regulation, SAPV delivery models can and do differ regarding team structures, financing models, cooperation with other care professionals and processes of care. The research project SAVOIR is funded by G-BA's German Innovations Fund to evaluate the implementation of the SAPV directive.

methodsThe processes, content and quality of SAPV will be evaluated from the perspectives of patients, SAPV teams, general practitioners and other care givers and payers. The influence of different contracts, team and network structures and regional and geographic settings on processes and results including patient-reported outcomes will be analyzed in five subprojects: [1] structural characteristics of SAPV and their impact on patient care, [2] quality of care from the perspective of patients, [3] quality of care from the perspective of SAPV teams, hospices, ambulatory nursing services, nursing homes and other care givers, content and extent of care from [4] the perspective of General Practitioners and [5] from the perspective of payers. The evaluation will be based on different types of data: team and organizational structures, treatment data based on routine documentation with electronic medical record systems, prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes in a sample of SAPV teams, qualitative interviews with other stakeholders like nursing and hospice services, a survey in general practitioners and a retrospective analysis of claims data of all SAPV patients, covered by the health insurance fund BARMER in 2016. DISCUSSION: Data analysis will allow identification of variables, associated with quality of SAPV. Based on these findings, the SAVOIR study group will develop recommendations for the Federal Joint Committee for a revision of the SAPV directive.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00013949 (retrospectively registered, 14.03.2018), DRKS00014726 (14.05.2018), DRKS00014730 (30.05.2018). Subproject 3 is an interview study with professional caregivers and therefore not registered in DRKS as a clinical study.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareClinical Trials as TopicDelivery of Health CareGeneral PracticeGermanyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPalliative CarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesQuality of Health CareTerminal CareAmbulatory careClaims dataEnd-of-life careGeneral practitionerHealth service researchMixed methodsPalliative carePatient reported outcomesQuality of careSpecialized outpatient palliative care

Identifiers

PMID30684958
PMCPMC6348077
OpenAlexW2918342998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.