Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30684636›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Generalized diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging (GDSI) for model-free reconstruction of the ensemble average propagator.

Qiyuan Tian, Grant Yang, Christoph Leuze, Ariel Rokem, Brian L Edlow, Jennifer A McNab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qiyuan TianDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Radiological Sciences Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Richard M. Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: qytian@stanford.edu.
Grant YangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Radiological Sciences Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Richard M. Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford, CA, United States.
Christoph LeuzeRadiological Sciences Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Richard M. Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford, CA, United States.
Ariel RokemeScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Brian L EdlowAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Jennifer A McNabRadiological Sciences Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Richard M. Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford, CA, United States.
Stanford University · USCenter for Neuro-Oncology · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
The Human Connectome Project (HCP)U01MH093765 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2010 to 2014
$12.1M
Training and DisseminationP41EB015891 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GLOVER, GARY H · 2012 to 2019
$10.7M
Foundations of MRI Corticography for mesoscale organization and neuronal circuitryR01MH111444 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI FEINBERG, DAVID ALAN · 2016 to 2020
$5.1M
Integration of Diffusion MRI Fiber Tracking and CLARITY 3D Histology for Improved Neurosurgical TargetingR01NS095985 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer A McNab · 2016 to 2026
$3.8M
Brainstem Network Determinants of Recovery from Traumatic ComaK23NS094538 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EDLOW, BRIAN L. · 2015 to 2019
$994k
Next Generation 7T MRI Platform Upgrade with Parallel Transmit CapabilitiesS10RR026351 · NCRR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RUTT, BRIAN KEITH · 2011 to 2011
$600k
Mixed-Reality Neuronavigation for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment of DepressionR21MH116484 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MCNAB, JENNIFER A · 2018 to 2019
$449k
Neural mechanisms of texture processing in central and peripheral visual fieldF32EY022294 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ROKEM, ARIEL SHALOM · 2012 to 2014
$156k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR026351NEI NIH HHS F32 EY022294NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015891NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111444NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH116484NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH093765NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS094538NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion spectrum MRI (DSI) provides model-free estimation of the diffusion ensemble average propagator (EAP) and orientation distribution function (ODF) but requires the diffusion data to be acquired on a Cartesian q-space grid. Multi-shell diffusion acquisitions are more flexible and more commonly acquired but have, thus far, only been compatible with model-based analysis methods. Here, we propose a generalized DSI (GDSI) framework to recover the EAP from multi-shell diffusion MRI data. The proposed GDSI approach corrects for q-space sampling density non-uniformity using a fast geometrical approach. The EAP is directly calculated in a preferable coordinate system by multiplying the sampling density corrected q-space signals by a discrete Fourier transform matrix, without any need for gridding. The EAP is demonstrated as a way to map diffusion patterns in brain regions such as the thalamus, cortex and brainstem where the tissue microstructure is not as well characterized as in white matter. Scalar metrics such as the zero displacement probability and displacement distances at different fractions of the zero displacement probability were computed from the recovered EAP to characterize the diffusion pattern within each voxel. The probability averaged across directions at a specific displacement distance provides a diffusion property based image contrast that clearly differentiates tissue types. The displacement distance at the first zero crossing of the EAP averaged across directions orthogonal to the primary fiber orientation in the corpus callosum is found to be larger in the body (5.65 ± 0.09 μm) than in the genu (5.55 ± 0.15 μm) and splenium (5.4 ± 0.15 μm) of the corpus callosum, which corresponds well to prior histological studies. The EAP also provides model-free representations of angular structure such as the diffusion ODF, which allows estimation and comparison of fiber orientations from both the model-free and model-based methods on the same multi-shell data. For the model-free methods, detection of crossing fibers is found to be strongly dependent on the maximum b-value and less sensitive compared to the model-based methods. In conclusion, our study provides a generalized DSI approach that allows flexible reconstruction of the diffusion EAP and ODF from multi-shell diffusion data and data acquired with other sampling patterns.

Indexed as

BrainComputer SimulationDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeuroimagingDiffusion spectrum imagingEnsemble average propagatorModel-freeMulti-shell acquisitionOrientation distribution functionQ-space imagingSampling density non-uniformity correction

Identifiers

PMID30684636
PMCPMC6698152
OpenAlexW2914748457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.