Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30684437›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2019

Use of a Biofeedback Breathing App to Augment Poststress Physiological Recovery: Randomized Pilot Study.

David Plans, Davide Morelli, Stefan Sütterlin, Lucie Ollis, Georgia Derbyshire, Mark Cropley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Neurophysiological Markers of Regulation Success in Everyday Life in Depression.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David PlansBioBeats Group LTD, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0476-3342
Davide MorelliBioBeats Group LTD, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-6793
Stefan SütterlinFaculty for Health and Welfare Sciences, Østfold University College, Østfold, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4337-1296
Lucie OllisFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8774-7865
Georgia DerbyshireFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6776-3964
Mark CropleyFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8483-1797
University of Surrey · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe speed of physiological recovery from stress may be a marker for cardiovascular disease risk. Stress management programs that incorporate guided breathing have been shown to moderate the stress response and augment recovery.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of an app-based brief relaxation intervention (BioBase) for facilitating physiological recovery in individuals exposed to a brief psychological stressor.

methodsA total of 75 participants (44 women) completed a stressor speech task and were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: control, rumination, or an app-based relaxation breathing (BioBase) conditions. Heart rate variability (HRV) was assessed as a measure of autonomic function at baseline (6 min), during stress (6 min), and during recovery (6 min).

resultsThere was a significant increase in subjective stress following stress exposure, but the ratings returned to baseline after recovery in all three groups. In addition, there was a significant decrease in vagally mediated HRV in the poststress period. During recovery, the root mean square of successive differences (P<.001), the percentage of successive interbeat (RR) intervals that differ by >50 ms (pNN50; P<.001), and high-frequency (P<.02) HRV were significantly higher in the BioBase breathing condition than the rumination and control conditions. There was no difference in HRV values between the rumination and control conditions during recovery.

conclusionsApp-based relaxed breathing interventions could be effective in reducing cardiovascular disease risk. These results provide additional utility of biofeedback breathing in augmenting physiological recovery from psychological stress.

Indexed as

biofeedbackbreathingheart rate variabilityrecoveryruminationstress

Identifiers

PMID30684437
PMCPMC6682287
OpenAlexW2896585155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.