Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30684422›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2019

Community Engagement in the Development of an mHealth-Enabled Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health Intervention (Step It Up): Pilot Focus Group Study.

Joniqua Nashae Ceasar, Sophie Elizabeth Claudel, Marcus R Andrews, Kosuke Tamura, Valerie Mitchell, Alyssa T Brooks, Tonya Dodge, Sherine El-Toukhy, Nicole Farmer, Kimberly Middleton and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact of Public Risk Perception in China on the Intention to Use Sports APPs during COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joniqua Nashae Ceasar *National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8174-8242
Sophie Elizabeth Claudel *National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7695-4674
Marcus R AndrewsNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3281-1249
Kosuke TamuraNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4920-2856
Valerie MitchellNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9341-2535
Alyssa T BrooksClinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5979-316X
Tonya DodgeDepartment of Psychology, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8096-7013
Sherine El-ToukhyNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0329-5823
Nicole FarmerClinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3250-8688
Kimberly MiddletonClinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8696-1678
Melanie Sabado-LiwagDepartment of Public Health, California State University, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8026-7212
Melissa TroncosoUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0045-6035
Gwenyth R WallenClinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7134-1636
Tiffany M Powell-WileyNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9488-4131
National Institutes of Health · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USCalifornia State University Los Angeles · USGeorge Washington University · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

Tailoring Mobile Health Technology to Reduce Obesity and ImproveCardiovascular Health in Resource-Limited Neighborhood Environments: A Multi-Level, Community-Based Physical Activity InterventionZIAHL006225 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI POWELL-WILEY, TIFFANY · 2017 to 2025
$9.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-based participatory research is an effective tool for improving health outcomes in minority communities. Few community-based participatory research studies have evaluated methods of optimizing smartphone apps for health technology-enabled interventions in African Americans.

objectiveThis study aimed to utilize focus groups (FGs) for gathering qualitative data to inform the development of an app that promotes physical activity (PA) among African American women in Washington, DC.

methodsWe recruited a convenience sample of African American women (N=16, age range 51-74 years) from regions of Washington, DC metropolitan area with the highest burden of cardiovascular disease. Participants used an app created by the research team, which provided motivational messages through app push notifications and educational content to promote PA. Subsequently, participants engaged in semistructured FG interviews led by moderators who asked open-ended questions about participants' experiences of using the app. FGs were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim, with subsequent behavioral theory-driven thematic analysis. Key themes based on the Health Belief Model and emerging themes were identified from the transcripts. Three independent reviewers iteratively coded the transcripts until consensus was reached. Then, the final codebook was approved by a qualitative research expert.

resultsIn this study, 10 main themes emerged. Participants emphasized the need to improve the app by optimizing automation, increasing relatability (eg, photos that reflect target demographic), increasing educational material (eg, health information), and connecting with community resources (eg, cooking classes and exercise groups).

conclusionsInvolving target users in the development of a culturally sensitive PA app is an essential step for creating an app that has a higher likelihood of acceptance and use in a technology-enabled intervention. This may decrease health disparities in cardiovascular diseases by more effectively increasing PA in a minority population.

Indexed as

cardiovascular healthcommunity-based participatory researchhealth behaviorsmHealthmobile phonephysical activityqualitative data

Identifiers

PMID30684422
PMCPMC6682281
OpenAlexW2907052710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.