Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30684413›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2018

Factors Affecting Patient Portal Use Among Low-Income Pregnant Women: Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.

Juhee Kim, Holly Mathews, Lindsay M Cortright, Xiaoming Zeng, Edward Newton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. User Perception of New E-Health Challenges: Implications for the Care Process.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Is research on patient portals attuned to health equity? A scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juhee KimDepartment of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1094-3761
Holly MathewsDepartment of Anthropology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5217-334X
Lindsay M CortrightDepartment of Anthropology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4990-3804
Xiaoming ZengDepartment of Health Information and Management, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7839-5020
Edward NewtonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6802-6413

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient portals offer patients personalized and secure Web access to their medical information and enable patients to manage their health care online. However, there is a lack of information about patient acceptance and use of patient portals among low-income pregnant women.

objectiveThis formative research aims to assess the potential of a patient portal, MyChart, for improving prenatal health care and pregnancy outcomes, and identify the barriers and facilitators of MyChart use among low-income pregnant women.

methodsA mixed-methods study was conducted with a convenience sample of 18 low-income pregnant women comprising low- and high-risk patients enrolled in a prenatal clinic in eastern North Carolina. MyChart use, patient demographics, and pregnancy information were collected by reviewing electronic medical charts. Health literacy was measured. Reported use and attitudes toward MyChart were collected using a semi-structured interview.

resultsAlthough 39% (7/18) of participants interviewed signed up for MyChart, only 22% (4/18) of them became active users. Another 33% (6/18) had never heard of MyChart or was unsure of how to access it. Users primarily accessed test results and appointment schedules. The main facilitating factors for patient portal use were information and motivation from health care providers and concerns about pregnancy due to a history of miscarriage. Reported barriers were lack of educational resources, lack of care provider encouragement, and technical difficulties possibly exacerbated by low health literacy. Participants also suggested improvements for MyChart, especially the provision of discussion-based support for pregnant women.

conclusionsThe one-time verbal introduction of MyChart does not meet current patients' needs. Data reveal the need for more consistent patient education and support programs, tailored to patients' previous pregnancy histories. The clinic also needs to facilitate better provider-patient communication about the importance of MyChart use.

Indexed as

digital dividehealth literacypatient portalspovertypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID30684413
PMCPMC6334707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.