Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30684405›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2018

Developing Digital Facilitation of Assessments in the Absence of an Interpreter: Participatory Design and Feasibility Evaluation With Allied Health Groups.

Jill Freyne, Dana Bradford, Courtney Pocock, David Silvera-Tawil, Karen Harrap, Sally Brinkmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Creating safer cancer care with ethnic minority patients: A qualitative analysis of the experiences of cancer service staff.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Google Translate: Can It Be a Solution for Language Barrier in Neuraxial Anaesthesia?Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2021
    Article
  12. Definitions ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jill FreyneAustralian eHealth Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Marsfield, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7659-0535
Dana BradfordAustralian eHealth Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Pullenvale, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2939-3018
Courtney PocockWestern Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2720-4057
David Silvera-TawilAustralian eHealth Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Marsfield, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2653-0141
Karen HarrapAustralian eHealth Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Herston, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6792-2910
Sally BrinkmannWestern Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3842-2183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo ensure appropriate and timely care, interpreters are often required to aid communication between clinicians and patients from non-English speaking backgrounds. In a hospital environment, where care is delivered 24 hours a day, interpreters are not always available. Subsequently, culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) patients are sometimes unable to access timely assessment because of clinicians' inability to communicate directly with them.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to design and evaluate CALD Assist, a tablet app to assist communication between patients and allied health clinicians in the absence of an interpreter. CALD Assist uses key phrases translated into common languages and uses pictorial, written, and voice-over prompts to facilitate communication during basic patient assessment.

methodsCALD Assist's design, functionality, and content were determined through focus groups with clinicians and informed by interpreting and cultural services. An evaluation was conducted in a live trial phase on eight wards across 2 campuses of a hospital in Victoria, Australia.

resultsA commercial grade CALD Assist mobile app for five disciplines within allied health was developed and evaluated. The app includes a total of 95 phrases in ten different languages to assist clinicians during their initial assessment. Evaluation results show that clinicians' confidence in their assessment increased with use of the CALD Assist app: clinicians' reports of "complete confidence" increased from 10% (3/30) to 42% (5/12), and assessment reports of "no confidence" decreased from 57% (17/30) to 17% (2/12). Average time required to complete an assessment with patients from non-English speaking backgrounds reduced from 42.0 to 15.6 min.

conclusionsThrough the use of CALD Assist, clinician confidence in communicating with patients from non-English speaking backgrounds in the absence of an interpreter increased, providing patients from non-English speaking backgrounds with timely initial assessments and subsequent care in line with their English speaking peers. Additionally, the inclusion of images and video demonstrations in CALD Assist increased the ability to communicate with patients and overcome literacy-related barriers. Although a number of hurdles were faced, user uptake and satisfaction were positive, and the app is now available in the Apple App Store.

Indexed as

cross-cultural carecultural diversityculturally appropriate technologyehealth allied healthhealth care deliverylanguage barriersmobile apps

Identifiers

PMID30684405
PMCPMC6334691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.