Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30684301›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2019

Metastatic immune infiltrates correlate with those of the primary tumour in canine osteosarcoma.

Sita S Withers, Daniel York, Jin W Choi, Kevin D Woolard, Renee Laufer-Amorim, Ellen E Sparger, Jenna H Burton, Stephen J McSorley, Arta M Monjazeb, William J Murphy and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sita S WithersThe Comparative Oncology Laboratory and Center for Companion Animal Health, Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4107-3877
Daniel YorkThe Comparative Oncology Laboratory and Center for Companion Animal Health, Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.
Jin W ChoiCenter for Comparative Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Cell Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.
Kevin D WoolardDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.
Renee Laufer-AmorimDepartment of Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Ellen E SpargerDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.
Jenna H BurtonThe Comparative Oncology Laboratory and Center for Companion Animal Health, Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1895-8298
Stephen J McSorleyCenter for Comparative Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Cell Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.
Arta M MonjazebComprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, California.
William J MurphyDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, California.
Robert J CanterComprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, California.
Robert B RebhunThe Comparative Oncology Laboratory and Center for Companion Animal Health, Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.
University of California, Davis · USVeterinary Medical Teaching Hospital · USUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Gina M Dayton · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
UC Davis Paul Calabresi K12 Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA138464 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BIRKELAND, ANDREW CHARLES, LARA, PRIMO N. · 2011 to 2025
$11.4M
Gene Expression Analysis of Dog Natural Killer Cells Following Immunotherapy with Molecularly Targeted Radionuclide therapy or Inhaled IL-15U01CA224166 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CANTER, ROBERT J., REBHUN, ROBERT B · 2017 to 2021
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA138464NCI NIH HHS K12CA138464NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS P30CA093373NCI NIH HHS U01 CA224166NCI NIH HHS U01CA224166-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our lack of understanding of the immune microenvironment in canine osteosarcoma (cOSA) has limited the identification of potential immunotherapeutic targets. In particular, our ability to utilize readily available tissue from a dog's primary tumour to predict the type and extent of immune response in their pulmonary metastatic lesions is unknown. We, therefore, collected 21 matched pairs of primary tumours and pulmonary metastatic lesions from dogs with OSA and performed immunohistochemistry to quantify T-lymphocyte (CD3), FOXP3+ cell, B-lymphocyte (Pax-5), and CD204+ macrophage infiltration. We found that T-lymphocytes and FOXP3+ infiltrates in primary tumours positively correlated with that of metastatic lesions (ρ = 0.512, P = 0.038 and ρ = 0.698, P = 0.007, respectively), while a strong trend existed for CD204+ infiltrates (ρ = 0.404, P = 0.087). We also observed T- and B-lymphocytes, and CD204+ macrophages to be significantly higher in a dog's pulmonary metastasis compared to their primary tumour (P = 0.018, P = 0.018, P = 0.016, respectively), while FOXP3+ cells were only significantly higher in metastases when all primary tumour and metastasis lesions were compared without pairing (P = 0.036). Together, these findings suggest that the metastatic immune microenvironment may be influenced by that of the primary cOSA, and that primary tumour immune biomarkers could potentially be applied to predict immunotherapeutic responses in gross metastatic disease. We, therefore, provide a rationale for the treatment of cOSA pulmonary metastases with immunotherapeutics that enhance the anti-tumour activity of these immune cells, particularly in dogs with moderate to high immune cell infiltration in their primary tumours.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone NeoplasmsDog DiseasesDogsForkhead Transcription FactorsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticImmunohistochemistryOsteosarcomaPAX5 Transcription FactorScavenger Receptors, Class AT-LymphocytesForkhead Transcription FactorsPAX5 Transcription FactorScavenger Receptors, Class Adogsimmunotherapyneoplasm metastasisosteosarcomatumour microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID30684301
PMCPMC6658355
OpenAlexW2913049603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.