Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30684224›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2019

A participatory epidemiological study of major cattle diseases amongst Maasai pastoralists living in wildlife-livestock interfaces in Maasai Mara, Kenya.

Daniel Nthiwa, Silvia Alonso, David Odongo, Eucharia Kenya, Bernard Bett

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unraveling clonal CD8 T cell expansion and identification of essential factors in γ-herpesvirus-induced lymphomagenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An index for multidimensional assessment of swine health.Tropical animal health and production · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel NthiwaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Embu, P. O BOX 6, Embu, 60100, Kenya. danielmutiso8@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3993-4164
Silvia AlonsoInternational Livestock Research Institute, (ILRI), P. O BOX 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
David OdongoSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, P. O BOX 30197, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Eucharia KenyaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Embu, P. O BOX 6, Embu, 60100, Kenya.
Bernard BettInternational Livestock Research Institute, (ILRI), P. O BOX 30709, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
University of Embu · KEInternational Livestock Research Institute · KEUniversity of Nairobi · KE

Funding

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst Special Initiative "A World without Hunger", 2015 (57221138)European Union?s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 641918, awarded to the African Bioservices project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Livestock-wildlife interactions promote the transmission of a wide range of infectious diseases that constraint livestock production. We used a participatory appraisal approach to find out and rank infectious diseases of concern to pastoralists in a zone of intense wildlife-livestock interaction and another zone with limited interactions. Four villages were selected purposively in areas with intensive cattle-wildlife interactions (zone 1), and another two in areas with low to moderate cattle-wildlife interactions (zone 2). Data were collected in focus group discussions (FGDs) using participatory epidemiological methods (PE); each group had 8-13 participants. Results of impact matrix scoring from all sites indicated that malignant catarrhal fever (MCF), anthrax, foot and mouth disease (FMD), contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP), east coast fever (ECF) and African animal trypanosomiasis (ATT), in decreasing order, had the highest impact on livestock production. A Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a significant difference in FMD annual prevalence between cattle age groups (p < 0.001) and was the highest in animals > 4 years (median score of 32.5, range, 10-50). FMD had the highest impact on milk production, but based on veterinary costs (treatment costs), it was ranked second to CBPP. The study provides information on disease priorities that occur in the target zones in Mara ecosystem and which the local pastoralists must consider when accessing key ecosystem services such as water and pasture.

Indexed as

EnvironmentAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnimals, WildCattleCattle DiseasesKenyaLivestockPrevalenceCattle diseasesLivelihoodsMaasai pastoralistsParticipatory techniques

Identifiers

PMID30684224
PMCPMC6520318
OpenAlexW2912020329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.