Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30684201›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019

Health Care Providers' Experiences with Implementing Medical Aid-in-Dying in Vermont: a Qualitative Study.

Mara Buchbinder, Elizabeth R Brassfield, Manisha Mishra

Abstract readCase ReportsMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mara BuchbinderDepartment of Social Medicine, Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. mara_buchbinder@med.unc.edu.
Elizabeth R BrassfieldDepartment of Philosophy and School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Manisha MishraUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008719 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DARVILLE, TONI, DESHMUKH, MOHANISH P · 1999 to 2023
$15.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evolving legal landscape for medical aid-in-dying (AID) in the USA raises clinical and public health challenges and concerns regarding how health care providers will accommodate AID while expanding access to high-quality end-of-life care.

objectiveTo describe Vermont health care providers' experiences practicing under the "Patient Choice and Control at End of Life" Act.

designQualitative semi-structured interviews analyzed using grounded theory.

participantsThe larger study included 144 health care providers, terminally ill patients, caregivers, policy stakeholders, and other Vermont residents working in 10 out of Vermont's 14 counties. This article reports on a subset of 37 providers who had clinical experience with the law. MAIN MEASURES: Themes from interviews. KEY

resultsPhysicians were roughly split between hospital and community-based practices. Most were women (68%) and the largest subgroup specialized in internal or family medicine (53%). Most of the nurses and social workers were women (89%) and most worked for hospice and home health agencies (61%). We identified five domains in which participants engaged with AID: (1) clinical communication and counseling; (2) the Act 39 protocol; (3) prescribing medication; (4) planning for death; and (5) professional education. How providers experienced these five domains of clinical practice depended on their practice setting and the supportive resources available.

conclusionHealth care providers' participation in AID involves clinical tasks outside of responding to patients' requests and writing prescriptions. Research to identify best practices should focus on all domains of clinical practice in order to best prepare providers.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRight to DieSuicide, AssistedTerminal CareVermontend-of-life careethicshealth policymedical aid-in-dyingqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID30684201
PMCPMC6445925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.