Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30684200›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019

A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Providers' Experiences with the Veterans Choice Program.

Andrea L Nevedal, Todd H Wagner, Laura S Ellerbe, Steven M Asch, Christopher J Koenig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Preventive Care Delivery After the Veterans Choice Program.American journal of preventive medicine · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea L NevedalCenter for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. Andrea.Nevedal@va.gov.
Todd H WagnerCenter for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Laura S EllerbeCenter for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Steven M AschCenter for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Christopher J KoenigCenter for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.

Funding

Access to Specialty Care for Veterans with Complex ConditionsI01HX001056 · VA · VETERANS ADMIN PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYS · PI WAGNER, TODD H · 2015 to 2019
–
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act (hereafter, Choice Program) seeks to improve access to care by enabling eligible Veterans to receive care from community providers. Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care providers (PCPs) play a key role in making referrals to community specialists, but their frontline experiences with referrals are not well understood.

objectiveTo understand VA PCPs' experiences referring patients to community specialists while VA works to expand and refine the implementation of the Choice Program.

designQualitative study using interview methods.

participantsSemi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with VA primary care providers (N = 72 out of 599 contacted) recruited nationally. APPROACH: Open-ended interview questions elicited PCP perceptions and experiences with referrals to community specialists via the Choice Program. Keywords were identified using automated coding features in ATLAS.ti and evaluated using conventional content analysis to inductively describe the qualitative data. KEY

resultsVA PCPs emphasized problems with care coordination and continuity between the VA and community specialists (e.g., "It is extremely difficult for us to obtain and continue continuity of care because there's not much communication with the community specialist"). They described difficulties with tracking the initial referral, coordinating care after receiving community specialty care, accessing community medical records, and aligning community specialists' prescriptions with the VA formulary.

conclusionsThe VA Choice Program provides access to community specialists for VA patients; however, VA primary care providers face challenges tracking referrals to community specialists and in coordinating care. Strategies to improve care coordination between the VA and community providers should focus on providing PCPs with information to follow Veterans throughout the Choice referral process and follow-up.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCommunity Health ServicesContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans Healthimplementation researchprimary carequalitative researchreferralsspecialty careVeterans

Identifiers

PMID30684200
PMCPMC6445927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.