Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30684167›Full record

ArticlePituitary2019

Pituitary incidentalomas in paediatric age are different from those described in adulthood.

Pedro Souteiro, Rúben Maia, Rita Santos-Silva, Rita Figueiredo, Carla Costa, Sandra Belo, Cíntia Castro-Correia, Davide Carvalho, Manuel Fontoura

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Genetics of Pituitary Adenomas.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019
    Review
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pedro SouteiroDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal. pedrobsouteiro@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1359-814X
Rúben MaiaNeuroradiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Rita Santos-SilvaFaculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Rita FigueiredoNeuroradiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Carla CostaFaculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Sandra BeloDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
Cíntia Castro-CorreiaFaculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Davide CarvalhoDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
Manuel FontouraFaculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTHospital de São João · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGuidelines on pituitary incidentalomas evaluation and management are limited to adults since there are no data on this matter in the paediatric population. We aim to analyse the morphologic characteristics, hormonal profile and follow-up of these lesions in children.

methodsWe have searched for pituitary incidentalomas in the neuroimaging reports and electronic medical records of the Paediatric Endocrinology Clinic of our centre. Patients with 18 years-old or less were included.

resultsForty-one incidentalomas were identified, 25 of them (62.4%) in females. The mean age at diagnosis was 12.0 ± 4.96 years-old. Headaches were the main reason that led to image acquisition (51.2%) and MRI was the imaging method that detected the majority of the incidentalomas (70.7%). The most prevalent lesion was pituitary hypertrophy (29.3%), which was mainly diagnosed in female adolescents (91.7%), followed by arachnoid cysts (17.1%), pituitary adenomas (14.6%) and Rathke's cleft cysts (12.2%). Most patients (90.2%) did not present clinical or laboratorial findings of hypopituitarism or hormonal hypersecretion. Four patients presented endocrine dysfunction: three had growth hormone deficiency and one had a central precocious puberty. Twenty-three patients (56.1%) underwent imagiological revaluation during a median follow-up time of 24.6 months (interquartile range 5.07). None of them presented dimensional progression.

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first series of pituitary incidentalomas in pediatric age. Comparing our series with those conducted in adults, we have observed a higher preponderance of pituitary hypertrophy over adenomas, a lower prevalence of hormonal hyper/hyposecretion and lower risk of dimensional progression during follow-up.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleNeuroimagingPediatricsPituitary GlandPituitary NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesIncidentalomaNeuroimagingPediatricsPituitary gland

Identifiers

PMID30684167
OpenAlexW2913020370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.